[Marxism] California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban By

Walter Lippmann walterlx at earthlink.net
Thu May 15 11:54:18 MDT 2008


May 15, 2008 

California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban 
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 1:05 p.m. ET

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has overturned a
ban on gay marriage, paving the way for California to become the
second state where gay and lesbian residents can marry.

The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that domestic
partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage in an
opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George.

The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen gay
and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay rights group
in March 2004 after the court halted San Francisco's monthlong
same-sex wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's
direction.

=============================

Thanks to Rex Wockner for this:

>From the California Supreme Court opinion...

[snip]

Accordingly, in light of the conclusions we reach concerning the 
constitutional questions brought to us for resolution, we determine that 
the language of section 300 limiting the designation of marriage to a 
union "between a man and a woman" is unconstitutional and must be stricken
from the statute, and that the remaining statutory language must be 
understood as making the designation of marriage available both to 
opposite-sex and same-sex couples. In addition, because the limitation of 
marriage to opposite-sex couples imposed by section 308.5 can have no 
constitutionally permissible effect in light of the constitutional 
conclusions set forth in this opinion, that provision cannot stand. [Rex 
notes: 308.5 is Prop 22]

Plaintiffs are entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandate directing the 
appropriate state officials to take all actions necessary to effectuate 
our ruling in this case so as to ensure that county clerks and other local 
officials throughout the state, in performing their duty to enforce the 
marriage statutes in their jurisdictions, apply those provisions in a 
manner consistent with the decision of this court.  Further, as the 
prevailing parties, plaintiffs are entitled to their costs.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed, and the matter is 
remanded to that court for further action consistent with this opinion.

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S147999.PDF





More information about the Marxism mailing list