dual systems and adaptation in general

wesley david cecil wcecil at ucs.indiana.edu
Tue Nov 8 12:05:30 MST 1994

> When we say that men are another "class" who "exploit" women, we transform
> men into the class enemy.  How are we going to organize ourselves as an
> economic class if we go around vilifying half the class?  Certainly, men oppress
> women.  Not all men, not all the time, not even half the time because they
> choose to.  The capitalist system, which is indeed the BASE, creates structures
> in which men are relatively privileged.  The capitalists do not conspire with
> men to exploit women.  Men themselves suffer TREMENDOUSLY from the system
> of patriarchy.  Patriarchy warps and distorts their character structures.
> As Reich would argues, psychosexual misery knows no gender.  Can the same
> be said for economic class?  Does capitalism oppress the capitalist economically?
> Only as he ceases to be a capitalist--or all the way to the bank!
> It also prevents men from thinking clearly about the alliances they need to make
> to overthrow their real oppressers.  It identifies them WITH their oppressors:
> men, and women identify with characters like Donald Trump, who move from
> buxom babe to buxom  babe, with narry a care as to whom leaves on the trash
> heap of his sexual escapades (See VEBLEN).
> So please, let's remain clear in our thinking. Let's retain those old hoary
> Marxist concepts of base/superstructure until very good reason can be shown
> to discard them.  Yes, call me an old fogey, but I'm proud to be a Marxist-
> feminist.  And a socialist one, too.
	I agree that we should not be to rductive in our models of
exploitation.  However, I think making Donald Trump the enemy is quite
incorrect. Capitalism is a system and no individual is really all that
important.  The problems are basically -- in terms of Marxism/Feminism --
the power nexus of gender and private property and the ideological systems
that adhere to them.



More information about the Marxism mailing list