ehrbar at econ.utah.edu
Mon Nov 14 07:19:36 MST 1994
Those arguing about the Fichte-Hegel-Marxian Thesis-antithesis-synthesis
should be aware that Bhaskar in his Dialectic, Verso 1993, says that
one should really have FOUR terms. My understanding of it is as follows:
Hegelian dialectic (1) starts with something, (2) finds its faults
(negation), and (3) overcomes its faults (negation of the negation).
It is, as Bhaskar says, undialectic even on its own terms
because it ends in a static closure.
Bhaskar's dialectic (1) starts with an ill (perhas social ill),
a want, or a mission. (2) It remedies this ill
(absention of the original absence).
(3) This process runs into obstacles, and (4) it overcomes these
obstacles. Thus it is the dynamic never-ending process
of ``absenting constraints on absenting illnesses.''
If you want to read some other new thoughts, I recommend Bhaskar's
Dialectic; unfortunately, it is hard to understand without his other
works, Realist Theory of Science, and Possibility of Naturalism. His
Reclaiming Reality in Verso is a failed attempt to make his other
works better accessible; it is not easier but harder to understand,
therefore I do not recommend it.
Hans G. Ehrbar ehrbar at econ.utah.edu
Economics Department, 308 BuC (801) 581 7797
University of Utah (801) 581 7481
Salt Lake City UT 84112-1107 (801) 585 5649 (FAX)
For Info about our Graduate Program Contact program at econ.sbs.utah.edu
More information about the Marxism