Bosnia, CPUSA and Leo's Counterrevolutionary Stance
booth2 at husc.harvard.edu
Fri Aug 4 16:09:13 MDT 1995
Now that hurts, Rob. I only post my sophmoric thoughts for your
You're welcome to Leo, by the way. Are you following
him to Bosnia? Locked and loaded with your Serb insignias memorized?
How 'bout the meaning of my post? Are you for intervention?
Trusting of U.S. imperialism? Did you ever see anyone get shot?
Too bad about using the word proletarian as a term of derision, though.
Too bad personal experience counts for less than academic bullshit.
-- Jeff Booth
On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Rob Frantz wrote:
> Your entire approach is boorish and sophmoric. So, gee whiz, your
> dialectical and your anti-imperialist and oh so proletarian.
> Get a life!
> I'll take Leo over you any time any day., Mr. Workers' Hero!
> Rob "Harmonica Blowin' Fool" Frantz
> On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Jeffrey Booth wrote:
> > Leo, I was so bored I fell asleep but then woke up again at the
> > end. So what's your logic? (You've already stated on publabor that you
> > don't believe in dialectics so I assume your "method" is logic). The
> > imperialist powers are nicer than at the time of the Gulf War? They'll be
> > more careful this time? Maybe they won't slaughter as many Serbian
> > civilians or surrendering Serbian soldiers as they did Iraqi civilians and
> > soldiers? I don't believe in the "efficacy" of smart bombs anymore than
> > I believe in the efficacy of liberal logic.
> > Why is imperialist genocide more acceptable to you than what the
> > SERBIAN RULING CLASS is doing? Sorry to shout but you've proven yourself
> > to be deaf, dumb and blind when it comes to any mention of class.
> > -- Jeff Booth
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 1995 LeoCasey at aol.com wrote:
> > > There is some point in every "exchange" with those theologically committed to
> > > sectarian politics that it becomes crystal clear that any meaningful
> > > conversation is completely beyond the realm of possibility, and that further
> > > engagement borders on the masochistic. I have reached that point. If I needed
> > > any evidence that such a point had been reached, consider the following form
> > > of Mr. Booth's latest epistle.
> > >
> > > In his message:
> > > >Also, I'm still waiting to collect my money on the Gulf War bet.
> > > >C'mon, confirm or deny that you supported it... . It's relevant to
> > > >establish (for anyone that cares) your consistent support of Imperialism.
> > > >
> > > > -- Jeff Booth
> > >
> > > And right below it, in my previous message which he quotes:
> > >
> > > >On Fri, 4 Aug 1995 LeoCasey at aol.com wrote:
> > > ...>> Is it even necessary to point out that Booth has not the faintest idea
> > > of my
> > > >> income, but he nonetheless chooses to raise this entirely irrelevant red
> > > >> herring and ad hominem attack? (God forbid that he actually check out how
> > > >> handsomely paid inner city public school teachers are before he flings his
> > > >> abuse from the deprived and poverty ridden precincts of Harvard.) Or that
> > > he
> > > >> knows absolutely nothing concerning my views about the Gulf War? (For the
> > > >> record, I was against it.)
> > >
> > > Now that we know that there is not even a pretense of reading, much less
> > > considering, a different viewpoint, I can happily bring my participation in
> > > this little charade to a close.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> > >
> > --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism