CLR JAMES, SOCIAL BEING, TOTALITY, RACE
kennym at uclink2.berkeley.edu
Thu Mar 16 10:43:42 MST 1995
I'm not sure what you mean by the "concrete whole". I mean, I think
"white supremacist capitalist patriarchy" is the "concrete whole", but
writing it that way sure makes it look awfully abstract. I don't think
one can defend the "concrete" philosophically. (Philosophy is just not
concrete.) That's why I use Sartrean terminology (learned primarily from
reading Jameson) regarding totalization as an abstracting process, and
totality as the unreachable, but scientifically necessary, systematization.
As for CLR JAmes: I don't want to act like I know more about him than I
do. I think a reading of *Black Jacobins* which discussed the notion
that consciousness determines social being is feasible, but perhaps it
would be inappropriate. I do know that, as someone whose been pretty
deep into pan-Africanism, I have found Du Bois and Fanon of much greater
ongoing use than James. But I'm willing to be convinced that I'm wrong.
UC-Berkeley Ethnic Studies Graduate Group
Against: racism, sexism, homophobia, capitalism, militarism
For: the truth--and the funk!
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism