jjazz at freenet.hamilton.on.ca
Sun Oct 8 23:11:47 MDT 1995
On Mon, 9 Oct 1995, John R. Ernst wrote:
> Not to worry so much. My old classmate, Khalil, is forced to use what I
> call the "embodied" labor theory of value. In that theory, the social
> values of commodities are assumed to move harmlessly toward their
> individual values as economists hum the magic work -- "Competition." I
> am not sure for how long they must do this for the two concepts to
> coincide quantitatively, but let me assure you they have been doing it
> for some time.
Is this some `Strange Attractor' effect? :>
> To get to Khalil's point, you must also assume that capital inputs
> increase faster that outputs as productivity increases. This may be
> true as capitalism moves from manufacture to large scale industry but,
> as Marx notes, it is not true in capitalism itself.
> Kahlil does show, intentionally or not, that the simple way of
> intrepretating the concept of value can quickly become the source of
One of the reasons I'm not in a hurry to write any books is that I
wouldn't want to be caught publicly championing such crudity -- or is
there some silver lining I've missed here?
| Jim Jaszewski <jjazz at freenet.hamilton.on.ca> PGP Public Key available. |
| http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html |
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism