Fwd: The Long March

Gonzalez, Francisco GONZALEZ at blue.usa.com
Mon Sep 25 08:00:10 MDT 1995

I got this message over the weekend (I dont' know how these fascists got
my email address or if anybody else in this list received the same
message). I wrote a repply but the cowards apparently blocked their
return address. I will post my repply on the "marxism" list in case
someone knows how to forward it to the "National Alliance"


                 ******* ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS *******


If you are concerned about the fate Western/American civiliztion

and its people, please take the time to read this artcle.

                   The Long March

by Ian P. McKinney

SINCE THE LAST ELECTION that heralded the so-called "Republican

revolution" we hear a lot of talk announcing that liberalism is dead,

or at least on its last legs. That is what well-known conservatives

like Rush Limbaugh and others would have us all believe. Yes,

listeners, all we have to do is support Newt Gingrich and, of course,

keep on buying those Rush beer steins, and hopefully, according to the

plan, when Bill Clinton is voted out of office in 1996 and after we

elect a good conservative president, then all our worries will be


Does anyone actually think that an election or two will reverse well

over fifty years of liberal and alien subversion of our government and

institutions, the moral decay, the decline of the public school

system, the out-of-control immigration, the explosion of non-White

crime, or any of the other consequences of "diversity"? The present

Republican politicians usually do not even directly address these

issues. It would not matter if the Republicans were to be elected in

large numbers for the next fifty years: these problems would obviously

continue to grow worse. Unfortunately, we've allowed ourselves to be

convinced that liberalism consists of mostly economic issues: taxes,

welfare, deficit spending, etc. The fact of the matter is that

liberalism, at its core, has little to do with economics.

The economic issues that are constantly discussed in conservative

circles are only by-products of liberalism. The foundation and

wellspring of liberalism is the fraudulent doctrine of universal human

equality. This doctrine states, in short, that a person is nothing

more than a victim of his environment, born into the world as a blank

slate. Everything that he will become, every impulse and instinct,

every talent or flaw, every like or dislike, and even his

intelligence, is solely the product of external forces and life


For example, those who believe in the doctrine of human equality state

that there is no danger to our nation from the millions of

low-intelligence, crime-prone, and violent people now immigrating to

and reproducing in our cities at astronomical rates. All that we have

to do, they say, is to make sure that these millions are guided into

some do-gooding government program, like "Head Start" or "Midnight

Basketball," and they will all eventually become engineers, doctors,

and other kinds of productive contributors to our country. And what do

conservatives say? No midnight basketball for them. But they really

aren't too different from the liberals. They say: Give these

non-Whites a good education, economic opportunity, and prayer in the

schools; and soon the Jamaican drug gang members will be

indistinguishable from Beaver Cleaver. Modern-day conservatives and

liberals both accept the liberal ideas of equality and of the

overriding importance of the individual's environment.

If individuals are born with equal potential, and what they eventually

become is determined solely by their environment, then certainly it

follows that the races are also equal. If someone was to remove an

infant from the jungles of Africa and place that child into the home

of a typical White family here in America, then according to the

theory of equality we should expect that the Black child's

intelligence and abilities would be no different than those of a

typical White child raised under similar conditions. If that African

baby had been placed in Beethoven's crib and raised identically to

him, then that child would have eventually written the Ninth Symphony.

Had that African child been placed in William Shockley's crib he would

have invented the transistor. My examples may be exaggerated, but that

really is the essence of the modern religion of equalitarianism, which

is espoused by Clinton, Gingrich, and every other politician who wants

to be elected. It is a false religion, with Communist roots, and with

no scientific basis whatever.

I have mentioned the Tanser Study on a previous American Dissident

Voices program. This study was conducted as part of the doctoral

thesis of Dr. H. A.Tanser who was Superintendent of Schools in

Chatham, Ontario, in 1939. For approximately 100 years, Chatham had

been the home of Blacks who had escaped slavery via the so-called

"Underground Railroad" of the 19th century, and their descendants. The

study's goal was to show that these Blacks, living in equal social

conditions with Whites and attending the same schools for about a

century, would have developed IQs comparable to the Whites. The

numerous other studies conducted up until that time, it was claimed,

showed lower IQs for Blacks because American Blacks had been

segregated and discriminated against for their entire lives. Chatham

was an exception to that. The findings of the Tanser study revealed

quite the opposite of those expectations, however. There was an

approximate 15 point deficit in the average Black IQ test score when

compared with the average White score: the same difference which

existed and still exists between Black and White scores in Alabama or


The previously mentioned study is only one of many dozens conducted

over the years by various private, public, and military researchers.

They are unanimous in their findings. The IQ gap is unquestionably

real. Read The Bell Curve, available from National Vanguard Books, for

an objective summary of the data. The theory of human equality has

been scientifically demonstrated again and again to be false. The

interesting question is: Why do we find so many fanatical advocates of

this thoroughly discredited theory in the academy, in the media, and

in government?

Another issue on which modern Republicans agree with Bill Clinton is

that of the wonderful benefits of Third World immigration. The

equality doctrine states that the race of an immigrant is of no

consequence. Gingrich and Limbaugh and company state that all that is

necessary is for the immigrants to be imbued with the American

culture, whatever that is, and after a sufficient period of

acclimatization, they would be functionally identical to native-born

White Americans. The Republican "revolution" has zero chance of

reversing or even slowing the browning of America.

If intelligence varies to such degrees among racial groups, then it is

logical to believe other less tangible psychological characteristics

also vary by race. I am referring to characteristics that enable a

racial group to collectively create and sustain such a unique

civilization composed of the body of art, learning, politics, social

organization, etc.: the mental characteristics comprising the natural

abilities and tendencies that exist within that racial group. It is a

synthesis of intelligence and racial "personality" that  is the root

of culture.

Why does one group of people develop an advanced society, while others

remain at a savage level? Why do some races seem incapable of

developing or maintaining an advanced society even when exposed to --

and in cases actively aided by -- more advanced civilizations, while

others are able to quickly adapt outside ideas and technologies and

then go on to develop them in their own unique ways? Those are good

questions, but do not expect a rational answer from a liberal. Their

answer will be that it's "racism" and "bigotry" on the part of Whites

and in some cases Asians for the inability of Black Africa, for

example, to move much beyond the Stone Age. The glaring failure to

develop in Africa causes severe consternation among liberals, and

their shrill calls for more foreign aid, more exchange students, more

"uplift" programs, more "democracy," ad infinitum, are simply

desperate efforts to cover for the total intellectual bankruptcy of

the equality doctrine. For an equalitarian to face the fact that

an endless supply of money and assistance will not bring any lasting

improvement to a place like Africa would destroy his belief system and

would require a massive philosophical reassessment.

The deteriorating social conditions that are occurring in the United

States and the rest of the White world are the direct results of an

insane immigration policy and the tremendous birthrate of the

non-Whites already here. Both of these have their roots in the

doctrine of equality. How did this doctrine become the state religion

of the new rulers of America? Our ancestors 100 years ago certainly

never believed in such nonsense. What happened? To answer that

question, we must travel back those 100 years and examine the career

of one Franz Boas, whom the liberal intellectual establishment regards

with almost religious reverence. Boas was an academic with Communist

sympathies, and was actually cited by the United States Congress for

over 40 different Communist affiliations.

Communist strategy in the United States during the early part of this

century included what they called "the long march through the

institutions." This meant that Communists and sympathizers would

infiltrate and gain positions of influence in as many important

American organizations as possible; including churches, clubs, social

organizations, service groups, government departments, the legal

profession, and especially schools and colleges. In the event of a

Communist revolution, party members and sympathizers would already

have their fingers on enough levers of power to help the revolution

along and to govern once it took place. In the event that a violent

revolution did not take place, the "long march through the

institutions" would be an alternate road to power.

The Communists and those behind Communism, as we all know, took that

alternate road in this country. Once in positions of influence, they

were able to help each other, sway the minds of students and others

under them, and crush their disorganized and surprised opposition,

especially in the academy where they still rule today. Boas was one of

the most skilled practitioners of these skills.

Boas was born in Germany in 1858 of radical socialist Jewish parents.

His fame rests on his contributions to the field of anthropology, the

study of the origins and development of man and human societies. His

education included no study of anthropology; and how he got his Ph.D.

is something of a mystery, but nonetheless he went on to obtain a

professorship at Columbia University and subsequently created what is

known today as social or cultural anthropology. Cultural anthropology,

in contrast to physical anthropology, holds that external

environmental forces determine human development almost to the

exclusion of biology and genetics. Boas, who died in 1942, spent his

life energetically promoting the equality doctrine.

Over a period of several decades, the pupils of Boas were given the

air of authority that goes with doctoral degrees, and were placed into

positions of responsibility in anthropology departments of leading

universities around the nation. These Boas disciples received the

concerted backing of the press, radio, and TV (which were also by this

time in the hands of America's enemies). These media served as a

platform to freely espouse their "great" opinions on various issues.

At the same time, the critics of the "Boas School" were to a large

degree silenced.

A prominent Boas student, Professor Melville Herksovits, stated, "The

four decades of the tenure of his professorship at Columbia gave a

continuity to his teaching that permitted him to develop students who

eventually made up the greater part of the significant professional

core of American anthropologists, and who came to man and direct most

of the major departments of anthropology in the United States. In

their turn they trained the students who, with increases in general

interest in the subject...  have continued in the tradition in which

their teachers were trained."

Thirty years ago America's pre-eminent physical anthropologist, the

late Carleton Coon, minced no words in describing the chicanery of the

cultural anthropologists: "More serious are the activities of the

academic debunkers and soft-peddlers who operate inside anthropology

itself. Basing their ideas on the concept of the brotherhood of man,

certain writers, who are mostly social anthropologists, consider it

immoral to study race, and produce book after book exposing it as a

`myth'... and [saying] we should pretend that race does not exist.

These writers are not physical anthropologists, but the public does

not know the difference." So while the liberal anthropologists

continually lecture the public on racial matters through an endless

stream of books and articles, the fact is that they have no real

credentials for such pronouncements. Those with such credentials --

the physical anthropologists -- are seldom given a media forum.

 I do not want to leave the impression that physical anthropology was

somehow eliminated or absorbed by cultural anthropology. At the

present time the debate still rages between the two schools. Despite

decades of equality propaganda, some scholars are still intellectually

honest, you see, though the TV-watching and newspaper-reading public

almost never hears from them. Who were and are these cultural

anthropologists that have been propagandizing the public with the

equality doctrine? Therein lies the truly revealing aspect of the

matter. The most prominent among the Boas devotees are as follows:

Ashley Montagu (Jewish, despite the name), Raymond Pearl, Melville

Herskovitz, Herbert Seligman, Otto Klineberg, Gene Weltfish, Amram

Scheinfeld, Ruth Benedict, L.C. Dunn, Isador Chein, and Margaret Mead.

It is very noteworthy that a very high proportion of the Boas

illuminaries were foreign born, and in almost every case Jewish. The

two women mentioned, Mead and Benedict, were reportedly a lesbian

couple. Does Jewishness prove Communist or subversive motives by

itself? No, but when one considers the Communist connections of Boas

himself, and the fact that Ruth Benedict, Gene Weltfish, Melville

Herskovitz, and especially Ashley Montagu, had all been connected with

Communist activities, and when one also considers the long history of

Jewish domination of the Communist movement, it certainly would cause

one to view the whole group with extreme suspicion. It would be

reasonable to suspect that these individuals might not have America's

best interests at heart.

The history of Boas and the equality doctrine is an interesting

illustration in itself of the dangers inherent in the presence of

alien influences within even a relatively homogeneous nation, which is

what America was back during the era of Boas' domination of Columbia

University's anthropology department. Being non-political, as scholars

generally were, the physical anthropologists were simply unaccustomed

to dealing with an alien group within their midst possessed of both a

fervent political agenda and a powerful ethnic nationalism, who were

bent upon twisting scholarship into a propaganda tool. Combine the

collaboration of the partisan media with the willingness of the "Boas

School" to distort and falsify science, and we see the operation in

its essence and as it still functions today. It is a sobering example

of the kind of subversion that has taken place in so many areas of

American society.

Certainly the subversion continues today and has deeply damaged our

society. We have fallen so far that the Republican party, viewed by

many well-meaning White Americans as the nation's salvation, is

saturated with the equality philosophy. The examples are numerous.

The victory of Proposition 187 in California was a result of the total

frustration of Californians with the totally ineffectual efforts of

the federal government to stop illegal immigration. The initiative,

which has now technically become law though Jewish lawyer Mark

Silverman has vowed it will be "litigated for years" and the will of

California's people has been stifled, would simply  prevent illegal

aliens from obtaining public welfare, public medical assistance, and

access to public schools, and would increase the penalties for the

counterfeiting of documents used by illegals to obtain employment.

When it began to look like the proposition was going to win, we saw

two of the most prominent "conservative" gurus, Jack Kemp and William

Bennett, travelling to California and making public statements

attacking the provision as "exclusionary" and "undemocratic." Another

example is the recent broadcast statement of the House Speaker, Newt

Gingrich, in which he proclaimed that we must accept an "integrated

society." Actually the evidence of Newt Gingrich's liberalism goes

much deeper than a few public statements.

Recently, Speaker Gingrich wrote the introduction to the book Creating

a New Civilization by Jewish authors Alvin and Heidi Toffler. Mr.

Toffler has written several popular books over the years projecting

his vision for the future of society; two of the most well known being

Future Shock and The Third Wave. Contained within the pages of their

most recent book is the advocacy of, among other things, both

homosexual and polygamous marriages, convenience abortion, and various

kinds of "New Age" claptrap. Also singled-out for praise in several

instances in this book is the liberal Democratic Vice President, Al

Gore, Jr.

Throughout the book they repeatedly make much use of standard

Communist phraseology, and the Tofflers are reported to hold a sincere

reverence for Karl Marx himself. Furthermore, targets attacked by them

include traditional families, patriotism, and national sovereignty,

and they refer to a homogeneous population as a "curse." They even go

as far as to boldly claim that the principles held by our founding

fathers, and embodied in the Constitution, are "oppressive and

dangerous to our welfare." In other words, the Tofflers are

espousing the same old liberal, anti-American, "one world" garbage

that has been propagated by our enemies for the past sixty years or

more. And Newt Gingrich, the standard-bearer for the Republican Party,

wrote a glowing introduction to their book. If you cannot reason from

these facts -- if you still believe that the Republicans really oppose

the liberal program -- then there is indeed no hope for you.

In reading the Toffler's book, we find repeated calls for "diversity"

in nearly every chapter, and warnings that our only hope is to promote

and foster "diversity" in every aspect of American society. In

addition to this we find the declaration, in so many words, that we

cannot stop Third World immigration.

The long and short of the Toffler's recommended vision for America is

a society consisting of atomized and disconnected individuals of every

race, unified as members of a giant network harmoniously exchanging their

thoughts and ideas, and out of all this will emerge a "new civilization"

in the land that was once America. It is just a repackaging of all the

liberal hallucinations of the past: "the brotherhood of man," "the unity

of mankind," "one-world," "the new world order," "equality" and on and on

in the same old tired vein. Like trendy leftists everywhere these days,

the Tofflers do pay obeisance to "market forces" but then the economic

structure was never really the reason behind our enemies' calls for

revolution anyway.

As the Tofflers and their sycophants -- both Republican and Democrat

-- call for increased "diversity" as the remedy for our ills, more and

more White Americans are coming to the realization that "diversity" is

the cause of our problems rather than the cure. As ever-increasing

numbers of our people, especially in urban areas, are finding it

necessary to live behind electronic surveillance systems, armed

security guards, and barred windows -- all aimed at keeping

"diversity" at bay -- they will come to understand that in order for

our nation to survive, diversity is something to be prevented, not


A creative, conquering spirit still lies suppressed within the

consciousness of our people. That spirit has sustained us since the

beginning of our existence. It will emerge again.

Instead of conquering a vast wilderness or exploring uncharted regions

of territory or knowledge, we must come to realize that the present

struggle is an intellectual and spiritual one within ourselves. In

order to have any chance of survival we must purge from our minds the

popular superstitions and fetishes popularized by the media. We must

reject the do-gooding hallucination of "brotherhood," the self-hate

that has been so cleverly injected into so many of our people, and of

course, the destructive alien doctrine of liberalism and its parent,

equalitarianism, regardless of whether we hear them from conservatives

or liberals, Republicans or Democrats.

After that battle has been won, the job of straightening out North

America and our people's homelands around the world will be

comparatively easy. That is why the enemies of America are so

terrified that you might wake up.

**This article was based on the *American Dissident Voices* program of

1st July, 1995.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The only truly uncensored patriotic radio program in America,

is now heard worldwide on shortwave, on satellite, and on AM

and FM radio in most of North America.


Saturday 11:30am Central Time...............15420 kHz via WRNO

Saturday  8:00pm Central Time................7355 kHz via WRNO

Sunday    7:30pm Central Time................7355 kHz via WRNO


NEW TIME! beginning in September 1995

Saturday  6:00pm Central Time...............C1, channel 15,

                                            7.56 MHz audio


from the Gulf of Mexico to the Dakotas and Minnesota, plus

parts of south central Canada via KAAY, Little Rock, Arkansas:

Friday night/Saturday morning

          1:00am Central Time.......1090 on your AM dial

Saturday night

          11:30pm Central Time......1090 on your AM dial


from Minnesota and Iowa west to Colorado and Montana, plus

a large part of western Canada via KXEL, Waterloo, Iowa:

Mon-Fri   9:30pm Central Time.......1540 on your AM dial


(these stations can be heard in most of Arkansas)

via KMTL, Little Rock:

Saturday 10:00am.....................760 on your AM dial

via KAAY, Little Rock:

Friday night/Saturday morning

          1:00am....................1090 on your AM dial

Saturday  11:30pm...................1090 on your AM dial


via KSEY AM-FM, Seymour:

Saturday 8:30am.....................94.3 on your FM dial

Saturday 10:00am....................1230 on your AM dial


via KGOL, Houston:

Saturday 6:00pm.....................1180 on your AM dial


via WAJF and WYAM, Decatur/Hartselle:

Wednesday 9:00am....................1490 on your AM dial

Wednesday 9:00am.....................890 on your AM dial


via WTIS, St. Petersburg:

Saturday 11:30am....................1110 on your AM dial


via WALE, Providence:

Saturday 10:30am.....................990 on your AM dial

For further information write to:

National Alliance

PO Box 90

Hillsboro, WV 24946


Please include $1 for postage.

National Alliance can also be reached at:

WORLD WIDE WEB: http://www.natvan.com (if unavailable, try our ftp site)

FTP SITE: ftp.netcom.com, path /pub/NA/NA

     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---


More information about the Marxism mailing list