CHRIS: Re: Peru

Chris Faatz cfaatz at
Tue Apr 2 08:30:14 MST 1996

On Tue, 2 Apr 1996 Rubyg580 at wrote:

> In a message dated 96-04-01 Chris writes:
> > This l'st has become in this respect for some, a symbolic
> >enactment of the class struggle, instead of an opportunity
> >to comment on the class struggle going on out there.
> >
> >Chris
> A very revealing comment.  Those who want the class struggle
> to be only "out there" and not "here" are certain to be disappointed
> again and again.  The debate between bourgeois and proletarian
> ideology is not a "symbolic enactment" of class struggle, it is
> a form of class struggle.
> Gina/ Detroit
A very perceptive comment. And, imho, one of the key elements that
seems to be missing by the section of this list that insists that it
embodies the proletarian line is its rigidity in application and in
general, underlying theoretical conclusions.

This is objectively anti-marxist.


     --- from list marxism at ---

More information about the Marxism mailing list