unions vs. the class struggle

neil 74742.1651 at compuserve.com
Sat Apr 6 00:01:33 MST 1996

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

From:	neil, INTERNET:74742.1651 at compuserve.com
DATE:	1/18/96 9:10 PM

RE:	unions vs. the class struggle

Sender: owner-marxism at jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Received: from virginia.edu (uvaarpa.Virginia.EDU []) by dub-img-3.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
	id AAA29414; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:06:32 -0500
Received: from jefferson.village.virginia.edu by uvaarpa.virginia.edu
          id aa25054; 18 Jan 96 23:56 EST
Received: by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34)
	id AA51603; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 04:29:45 GMT
Received: from dub-img-6.compuserve.com by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34)
	id AA51853; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 23:29:35 -0500
Received: by dub-img-6.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
	id XAA15440; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 23:29:33 -0500
Date: 18 Jan 96 23:10:49 EST
From: neil <74742.1651 at compuserve.com>
To: Marxism list-e-mail <marxism at jefferson.village.virginia.edu>
Cc: "L. godenas" <Godenas at aol.com>, Louis Proyect <lnp3 at columbia.edu>,
        Adam Rose <adam at pmel.com>
Subject: unions vs. the class struggle
Message-Id: <960119041048_74742.1651_EHL66-1 at CompuServe.COM>
Sender: owner-marxism at jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: marxism at jefferson.village.virginia.edu

Dear friends,

These forums are one of the good  places where we can debate and discuss ideas
and differences. It's the social world, class divided society where they get the
acid test  in practice. We thus, thru study and struggle, gain more knowlege and
can then  go through similar experiences agains and again to make positive
contributions to the cause of the working class..

In my 2  recent pieces on the unions and their class nature and practice , I
surely drew some  historicaI  / contemporary based conclusions  based on much
material evidence and experiences of the workers inside the unions. I myself
have been in 3 AF of Hell unions in my life, I have worked with other "Militant"
union reform groups for years to try to " turn the policy to a class struggle
path' and make them the 'schools for communism", etc.  Many  many new contacts
have been made,  both positive and negative. Many trade unionists of the ranks
themselves are  subjectively sincere and dedicated , and well meaning.
But as marxists, we should be materialists and scientific ones at that. Its not
just the subjective feelings of  individuals and/ or  groups or organizations
that determies their social role ,  Iit is in the main  the objective role they
play in the ongoing struggles of classes in class divide society, wheher they
help  perpetuate a decadent and barbaric social order, or whether they are part
of the artillery of the revolutionary cause of workers socialism and communism.
The track record of the unions themselves   exposes their  real class and social
role, to peddle the commodity wage labor on the cpaitalist market, to work with
the bosses to police the class and make certain the class struggles are kept
penned in and then derailed.
They did not not start out exactly this way in the last century as i pointed
out--they have from a working class point of view, degenerated and decayed and
became instruments in the service of the  capitalist state and the rich in each
nation state.. As has been explianed, the 20th century  changes in the nature of
capitalism and developement into world economy and imperialism, and the defeat
of mass movement s and revolutionary workers struggles has  greatly influenced

marxists dont bellow that its just the individual bosses that make capitalism
exploitative and anti-human  in  the present epoch. Its the institutions of
capitalism and groups that work  to politically/industrially uphold  capitalist
social relations that prop up the system. Changing republicans with democrats is
the bosses struggle not ours! Changing capitalist owners is the bosses fight,.
not ours. Changing whether the "left' or the right leaders in the unions  police
us  and help the
bosses keep ramming it to us, fore and aft, is  not a struggle we should take
sides in either. Pox on all their houses. May all their brains be palsied.!
Our duty politicllay as revolutionaries is , however, to intervene in the class
struggles in all their forms , industrial, political, cultural, etc and expose
the chicanery and fraud of the CON-servatives, Liberals, labor fakers, Fascists,
and ........Fake marxists, the  socialist labor fakers too!
Revolutionaries in unions should stay in them and fight from within against them
to win workers to militant class motions , new political/industrial  groupings
and connect this work to other  workers struggles.

L. Proyect must have a problem with reading & analysis  or is just putting up a
clever smokescreen . He should deal honestly with the many  factual points i
have made to back up my controverial  contentions. His snide remarks about
alleged  "bullshit"
and "rhetoric" are in fact a most fitting response  for those who hold his
outmoded views. If I wanted to defend politically bankrupt concepts in the face
of all evidence, i probably, a la Proyect, would not want to deal with the
issues at hand, up front  either. If he can show with a good body of concrete
evidence that  the unions in programme and practice are against the capitalist
system and wage slavery. I would be forced to rethink my views and admit i was
incorrect. But Proyect  is   totally impotent is this regard. C'mon Mr. Proyect,
the workers demand better!

Look at the points/ideas  L. godenas has added, His are controversial too, but
notice he does not rely or empty petty bourgeois sentimentality or  Bible
quoting. He looks at this  matter, the union question, in its concatination and
change, its contradictions and direction and developement. I think this bears
striking resemblance to the scientific materialist world outlook and dialectical
method. I kind of admire him for that alone!

The views of A. Rose, convince me he is probably a sincere working class
militant activist though we are in disagreement on the questions of the class
nature and working class tacticst in  political work inside the bourgeois trade
unions. I am not a trotskyist . I have disagreements with the his SWP-UK though
his group has been big strides in front of  most the rest of the left for
decades in exposing and fighting not only western style capitalism but they have
written some excellent  well researched materials  exposing the phony socialist
nature of the eastern  bloc state capitalist  regimes , pretty honestly dealing
with the INTERNAL dynamics of these economies as well as external realtions. The
Book "State Capitalism in Russia" by T. Cliff should be studied by all serious
marxists. I know it really helped open my eyes and those of others  who in the
past were under stalinist/revisionist influence..
But from mr. Rose, I would like to know how he can qualitatively separate the
class nature of Leaders of a social institution  from the institution itself?
Sounds like some kind of idealist  funk ?

In fact it is true that unions will be around with some hegemony both because
the system demands they be available--there is the market for labor, and because
the workers cannot superceed them until the experience of mass struggle impells
them to build qualatatively superior  industrial organizations--really opposed
to capital..

I hope this debate can continue and the objective reality of the crisis in the
workers camp almost assuures it will.


     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---

More information about the Marxism mailing list