dhenwood at panix.com
Thu Apr 11 06:54:40 MDT 1996
At 8:08 AM 4/11/96, Robert Malecki wrote:
>>This probably isn't the right place to ask the question, but I wonder what
>>the cost of beef would be were its social and environmental costs fully
>>reflected in its price.
>For some reason i am getting the feeling that the tone of this debate
>including the above is sort like people who have experienced everything and
>are now deciding for the masses under the cover of "marxist" (?) debate what
>is good for them and what is not.
A lot of bourgeois economics is crap, but the concept of externalities -
effects on third parties not reflected in market prices - is a useful one
(and one, properly considered, that's very damaging to bourgeois
economics). If some people raise and eat beef and cause immense damage to
non-raisers and non-eaters, the question is entirely relevant.
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
email: <dhenwood at panix.com>
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism