productivity

Jorn Andersen ccc6639 at vip.cybercity.dk
Sat Apr 27 18:34:03 MDT 1996


rakesh bhandari wrote
(after some valid arguments that its not rise in
productivity in itself which causes unemployment):

> And while service workers are oppressed (Carchedi)
> and to some extent necessary for the realization of
> surplus value, they are not necessary for its production
> and thus not exploited.

Jorn:
What does this mean - "not exploited"?
Does it mean that they don't produce surplus
value? No profit for the capitalists?
How come? I find it difficult to accept this.

----

Jorn Andersen

IS
Denmark



     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---




More information about the Marxism mailing list