Trotsky and Building Socialism--Can Socialism be "built" ?

Charlotte S. Wellen cwellen at pen.k12.va.us
Sat Apr 27 04:20:00 MDT 1996


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------385553186AD0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Richard wrote that Trotskyism does not have a role to play in the future
of building socialism.

What does this frequently used phrase acutually mean--"Building
socialism?"

Again I am making an appeal to all of you who may be interested in
defining socialism.  Not by a slogan or a fancy phrase.  Is socialism
practiced anywhere, has it been practiced anywhere, and if not, where
is it most likely to be practiced?

Are or have any of the following really been socialist?

The USSR 1917-1928
The USSR 1928-1989
China under Mao
Vietnam
Cuba
Scandanavian States governed by Socialist Parties
France under Mitterand
UK under Labor
Laos
North Korea
Burma (Myanmar)
Kampuchea (Cambodia)
The Socialist Democratic Republic of Sri Lanka
Spain before Franco
Spain under Socialist Felipe Gonzales
Costa Rica under Social Democrats
The Turkish City of Fatsa on the Black Sea Coast governed by
     Workers committees for a year in 1979
Kerala in India under the Communist Party of Kerala
Chile under Salvador Allende and his Communist Party of Chile
Libya under Socialist Kaddafi
Communist Yemen before unification
Any State in Eastern Europe prior to Perestroika and Glastnost
Egypt under Nasser
Syria or Iraq under the Socialist "Ba'ath Party"

I would like the best definition and best example of socialism you can
give me.

Sincerely,

Wei En Lin.

--------------385553186AD0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="current"

>From owner-marxism  Sun Jul 28 16:45:29 1996
Return-Path: owner-marxism
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.7.1/8.6.6) id QAA67900 for marxism-outgoing; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 16:45:22 -0400
Received: from ampere.meganet.co.uk (ampere.meganet.co.uk [193.123.8.2]) by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.7.1/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA96823 for <marxism at jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU>; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 16:45:19 -0400
Received: from hagcott.meganet.co.uk by ampere.meganet.co.uk with SMTP
	(1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA094106799; Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:46:39 +0100
Message-Id: <31FB636D.24E7 at hagcott.meganet.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 13:56:13 +0100
From: Richard Bos <Richard.Bos at hagcott.meganet.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: marxism at jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: Debating Trotskyists?
References: <v01540b07ae20ef55b5ff@[130.244.109.133]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-marxism at jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: marxism at jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU

Dear Hugh,

If I offended you with my gratuitous reposte at the end of my earlier
reply,I apologise. It is not really my style. But you did make the remark
about "grinding bones" first. Your questions did not seem serious, as you
asked them in a sarcastic tone, and in Louis P's name, not your own.

I am not the greatest of writers, so you will have to be a bit patient. I
intend to be part of this list for the forseeable future, so when the
subjects come up I will contribute to the disscussion.

Of course it is necessary to discuss and understand the roles of Trotsky
& Stalin, but when I say that "Trotskyism is irrelevant" I mean that it
doesn't have a role to play in the future building of Socialism.

--
Best wishes,

Richard.



     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---


--------------385553186AD0--



     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---




More information about the Marxism mailing list