Voting. Was Air your views... godena's support for elec

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Sun Aug 18 14:30:51 MDT 1996


At 3:01 PM 8/18/96, Louis N Proyect wrote:

>I mean, after all, if Foucault spends so much time refuting Marx, maybe we
>should set up a mailing list dedicated to the master of "metanarrative"
>himself.

Speaking of which, check out this horseshit (posted to the Bad Subjects
list a while back):

>Sender: bad at eng.hss.cmu.edu
>Reply-To: bad at eng.hss.cmu.edu
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Precedence: Bulk
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 22:15:25 -0500
>From: t byfield <tbyfield at panix.com>
>To: Multiple recipients of <bad at eng.hss.cmu.edu>
>Subject: le bingo
>
>[From a mondo Foucault book I'm esclaving away on, which focuses on the
>history of the "care of the self"--from Greek civicism, to the birth of an
>otiose Roman managerial asceticism, to the Christian interpretation of the
>self as sinful in the absence self-knowledge manifested in profession and
>connfession:]
>
>Q:      A work of the self on the self that may be understood as a certain
>liberation, as a process of liberation?
>
>MF:     I would be more careful on that score. I have always been somewhat
>suspicious of the notion of liberation, because if it is not treated with
>precautions and within certain limits, one runs the risk of falling back on
>the idea that there exists a human nature or base that, as a consequence of
>certain historical, economic, and social processes, has been concealed,
>alienated, or imprisoned in and by mechanisms of repression. According to
>this hypothesis, all that is required is to break these repressive
>deadlocks and man will be reconciled with himself, rediscover his nature or
>regain contact with his origin, and reestablish a full and positive
>relationship with himself. I think this idea should not be accepted without
>scrutiny. I am not trying to say that liberation as such, or this or that
>form of liberation, does not exist; when a colonized people attempts to
>liberate itself from its colonizers, this is indeed a practice of
>liberation in the strict sense. But we know very well...that this practice
>of liberation is not in itself sufficient to define the practices of
>freedom that will still be needed if this people, this society, and these
>individuals are to be able to define admissible and acceptable forms of
>existence or political society. That is why I emphasize practices of
>freedom over processes of liberation; again, the latter indeed have their
>place, but they do not seem to me to be capable by themselves of defining
>all the practical forms of freedom.

Doug

--

Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <dhenwood at panix.com>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>




     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---





More information about the Marxism mailing list