A 'recent' member of the Bolsheviks & October
Richard.Bos at hagcott.meganet.co.uk
Tue Aug 20 22:39:57 MDT 1996
Hugh Rodwell wrote:
> Richard B, trying to squash Nick H, wrote:
> >Note that I said "Trotskyist Party". Trotsky was then a member of the
> >Bolsheviks (a recent one), and acting under the guidence of the party
> >which certainly could not be described as a Trotskyist party. Even
> >Trotskists would not claim that I think. I do not think I was wide of the
> >mark at all.
> A couple of things about this remarkably stupid statement:
> 1) Granting for the sake of argument that the Bolsheviks weren't a
> Trotskyist party, they were even less a *Stalinist* party. Stalin's role in
> October was not merely minimal but in fact negative. Stalin had a position
> in the central bodies of the party, but he was no *leader* of the October
> revolution or the revolutionary Bolshevik party in 1917, and neither were
> the crew (the Molotovs etc) who later formed the core of the Stalinist
> counterrevolution. They were dragged along by events, reluctantly.
> So Richard shot his own balls off, not to put too fine a point on it.
1) I was not trying to squash Nick.
2) You agree that the Bolsheviks were not a Trotskyist party.
3) I did not make any claims about it being a "Stalinist" party.
4) There was nothing that you could point to as inaccurate in what I
5) Stop hurling insults about. I will not do it back to you. Then maybe
we can both learn something. I admit that I do not know it all. It would
be good if you would admit the same in an honest fashion.
New Worker Online http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2853
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism