fascism, buchanan, etc.
Bryan A. Alexander
bnalexan at umich.edu
Tue Feb 20 21:17:01 MST 1996
Some good points...
...but again, we need to keep in mind that fascism (by all of our
defs, now) is *always* in response to a broadly-threatening underclass
insurgency. We're not seeing that now, in any way.
However: real wages have fallen about 1% each year for the past
20 or so. So perhaps this election will help catalyze resentment, which
may move (with our help) into resistance and insurrections. *Then*
fascism will emerge - and it can rely on roots from today. So Buchanan
isn't important for '96, but for what he might organize and coalesce.
(Again, Buchanan is pushing me towards Hegelianism: in '91 or so
Clinton abandons traditional Democrat rhetoric about the underclass. Yet
this concern - still present in the welt. - manifests in Buchanan. Dole
tries to take part of this thunder and ends up mouthing pro-worker and
anti-corporation sentiments. Clinton responds by defending NAFTA and
Bryan Alexander Department of English
email: bnalexan at umich.edu University of Michigan
phone: (313) 764-0418 Ann Arbor, MI USA 48103
fax: (313) 763-3128 http://www.umich.edu/~bnalexan
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism