bayonets? muskets? the red cavalry?
hariette at easynet.co.uk
Wed Feb 28 15:52:59 MST 1996
>bayonets? muskets? the red cavalry?
>Those days are long gone. Radio transmission, aerial bombardment, floating
>air bases that can't be attacked by land, guided missiles, nuclear arsenals -
>to name a few examples - have changed the nature of warfare.
>Quotations from Marx and Lenin, though, do help to confuse the issues.
> --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Another funny Marxist: Technological advance in warfare renders Marxism
obsolete - that's all this baloney means!. Technology, not "men (the
masses) make history". Why people who "think" like this - philistines -
would want to call themselves "marxists"?. Beats me! All their purpose in
life is to deny the BASIC tenets - the very philosophy - upon which Marxism
is grounded. If they were honest with themselves, they would acknowledege
this fact and come out with a name of their own for their political thinking
- Marxism, certainly it is not!. What about "negation of Marxism"? Or, for
short and in tune with their techno-vertical post-modernist approach:
"N-Marx-ism". Or, being techno-militaristic and "grouchian": Why not
So quickly they forgot how US techno-military power got deriven of Vietnam.
Got worsted in Somalia, could not finish off Saddam, is trapping itself in
Yugoslavia, and has finally given-up on fighting wars, except as punishment
from the air. Fat lot of good that did them in Vietnam!
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism