Can this l*st be salvaged?
jlaari at cc.jyu.fi
Fri Feb 2 13:29:43 MST 1996
What to say?
Perhaps. But it'll take some work.
I subbed the list in summer 1994. I got long Welcome-message in which
aims of the list were told. Primarily list was intended for 'academic'
discussion on marxism. I don't know whether that same welcome post is
still standard reading for newcomers... However, as someone (sorry, I've
forgot who) already wrote, 'academics' in a sense or another usually are
marxist activists, too. So I don't see on what grounds splitting this
list could serve anything, except those for whom 'academic' questioning
is somehow a threat. Ergo: please, stop that splitting babble.
It seems to be one standard feature of the list (first one I remember
happened in autumn '94)! And it's annoying when it's repeated. There's
room for everyone - conceptual thinking isn't only for 'academics' - and
this list could be a good way to get information around the world for
both 'activists' and 'academics'. Provided, that people choose
discussion instead of flaming.
During the last 18-19 months flaming and the like have increased. You
don't have to be a statistician to tell that. When it comes to flaming,
I've had one rule of thumb for understanding it: a lack of arguments
causes flaming. I think it's simple as that.
Arrogance? Yes, there surely is that too, it's 'great heritage' of Marx.
Unfortunately his wit isn't as commonly associated with arrogance as it
should be. I don't know... somehow this list is today like some new age
group; a bit disappointed because it seems that One Wisdom resists
Partly because of these negative trends several people, who had something
to say, have unsubbed. Sad. I've sometimes noticed I've tried to guess
what N.N. or X would have said to some particular thread. Now we'll never
Yours, Jukka L
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism