MIM EXPOSED AND REBUTTED AGAIN (AND AGAIN)
c.everson at student.canberra.edu.au
Sat Jun 15 03:10:02 MDT 1996
THIS IS SUCH A GOOD POST I CONSIDERED IT NECESSARY TO POST IT AGAIN.
On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Luis Quispe wrote:
> MIM we have a series of articles on you, but don't want to waste
> space as yet, there are more important things to do amongst the oppresed
> here in the real world than to pay attention to you in the net. We had a
> good laugh with your crap in Spanish, we'll make to send it to Peru so
> our C. there can also have a good laugh. We laugh when you call
> "centrista," a "weak source" to Olaechea. Also when you say: "Quispe gave
> MIM the greatest honor of the PCP calling us the Red fraction of RIM."
> Where you got that story? was it verbal, in writing or in thumb signs?
> I don't think you guys ever met people from the MPP? we communicated by
> mail, that was it? By the way, you never deny your letter we publish here.
> then you have to swallow your complaint it was fabricated.
> Our friends and Comrades tell us: "it is a
> good thing to be attacked by MIM." You keep talking that you have obtained
> a victory in the list, what was it? What does it mean Quispe exposes
> himself? first you say Quispe was a cop (an old Comrade laugh until
> he pissed on his pants with this cop thing.) You tribiliaze the cop
> story to the point that we can denounce the real cops anylonger.
> > Malecki says:
> > Gina who at least wants to get a handle on the class enemies who she
> > realises are the enemy. However Aldolfo even before taking power is
> > offering the bourgeoisie posts in the government..
> > MIM replies:
> > Wow, Malecki, you are the greatest thing since sliced bread. How
> > lucky we at MIM feel these days. First Quispe exposes himself as a
> > turncoat and wrecker in print no less, while handing out his
> > fabrications liberally.
> It is easy to say turncoat, wrecker, cop, etc. but the point is to
> substantiate them. That's why people laugh on you and do not take you
> seriously. Do you want us to expose you more with more documents you
> have send the MPPs here and Europe? You know these are not fabrications.
> These will expose you as a reactioanary group even more. The P. doesn't
> want to hear from you MIM, you should comply with the Order of getting out
> from our struggle to the fullest extent.
> > Now you validate everything we said about Quispe and Avakianism
> > as crypto-Trotskyism.
> You said they were cops, do you mean crypto-Trotskist colonels?
> MIM you are incorregible, a laughing stock.
> Malecki, you are absolutely right! You have
> > found your true friends! Let me encourage you not to stop with the
> > paltry Gina and Quispite reaction on this list.
> You want my opinion on Mr. Malacki? He has a revolutionary record that we
> respect regardless of his ideology. But you MIM has no record at all.
> Except the reactionary anti-Maoist ideas you hold: 1) all white workers are
> reactionary, 2) all sexual intercourse is rape, 3) the PCP uphold MIM
> thought, 4) RIM is getting closer to MIM, 5) MIM suspends support to the PCP
> 6) MIM pickets against press strikers in Detroit, 7) MIM uncover police
> complot of MPP-USA, 8) MIM request the PCP to fire Quispe, 9) MIM makes
> a distinction between revisionist cops, revisionists, and revolutionary
> cops, 10) Come on send some money to MIM franchise...etc.
> > Before you start your mission you should
> > buy MIM Theory #9 with the article, "RCP-USA & Trotsky: A Literal
> > Comparison." Come on; send your $5 plus whatever postage it takes
> > to get a magazine to you to PO Box 3576, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA
> MIM is just like the RCP, a merchant. Why don't you 5 guys open a
> bookstore MA-1000?
> > (But don't be too loud about it, because Quispe is still trying to
> > pretend MIM hasn't published any criticisms of the RCP in a long
> > time while the CRCPA sectarian from Australia wants to make out
> > like we've been in unity with the PCP-criticized RCP-USA since 1988.
> Shameless MIM, how can you deny it? It is in print in your papers.
> CRCPA is a serious revolutionary Maoist organization, far to be sectarian.
> > The only problem with Quispe is that since he is on a police mission
> > regarding dividing the movement to support the People's War in
> > Peru right now,
> Silly MIM. You would say better: Police mission to divide what can not be
> divided anymore, the new atom discovered in the periodic table: MIMmie.
> By the way, where is the real MImie that used to post to this list?
> Does she/he has to do anythimng with MIM?
> he has to plagiarize and fabricate documents from
> > people who are still alive and can stop him!
> You needs facts MIM, otherwise you are a joke. Why don't you provide one
> singkle document to proof your case? Anyone can claim as a defense
> mechanism "fraud," "fabrication," "Avakianist," "CIA agent," etc. but
> if you don't corroborate, they are garbage. We are in new times than
> the Goebbels' era who used to say "repeat lies and lies, something will
> become into truth," there cannot be a dupe who can believe your nonsense.
> > trade where there are many who catch on, and thus he is forced
> > to be your instant friend, Malecki.
> We have never asked Mr. Malecki to be our friend. It doesn't mean that he
> doesn't merit respect from us and anybody else in this list. He is smart
> and make sometimes a good point. But MIM you don't make sense most of the
> time, especially when you try to comment on the People's War, you sound like
> a vulgar Senderologist.
> > Avakian is smarter.
> MIM: "RIM is getting closer to MIM...Avakian is smart...Quispe please Order
> me to be the Red fraction of MIM...Oleachea please Order me to fuck off."
> MIM you are ridiculous!
> Quispe does it right in front of
> > people's faces.
> Proof, substance...if not, it is rubbish. Many reactioanries we attack
> claimed "falsification" as a defense mechanism. We smashed the Zodiac
> (he fabricated a message from us, he said is was a Marxist joke and at the
> end someone clarified better what was Zodiac's role. He left with his
> tail under his legs.) We also denounced other scoundrels with facts and they
> know it well. And will continue to do so if they deserve.
> I'm sure a principled man like Malecki would not
> > stand for it and he will out those bastard RCP leaders in a second.
> We read in the RW that the RCP will make a major inroad into the Internet.
> We anticipate the little MIM jumping in bed and being raped by the "smart"
> The rest of you should send your money for MIM Theory #10
> Give money, money and money...Yankee revisionist and trafficker, why don't
> you open your shop and become a non-profit organization like Revolutioanary
> > Already MIM Theory #10 is a hit because it contains the quote from
> > Mao that Quispe called "cunning Yankee revisionist"!
> I didn't know that Mao was a Yankee revisionist. Probable Quispe was
> referring to your bald head leader in Michigan (M-5 b.s.)
> > For the rest of you cheapskates:
> > WWW: http//ursula.blythe.org/mim/
> > Read the PCP Web page: http://www.blythe.org/peru-pcp
> > Regards to all. Jesuits, yankee revisionists, liberal and revisionist cops.
> > Marcelina.
> > --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism