FUJIMORI USING A TROTSKYST LOUDHAILER to sell his "peace fraud"

hariette spierings hariette at easynet.co.uk
Tue Oct 8 11:27:32 MDT 1996


>I forward the following at the request of PO
>_________________________________________________
>
>
>In all the messages which Adolfo sent he didn't want to answer:
>
>* Why he lie on the question of a soviet in Lima 1963 which didn't exist at
all
>and which he claimed to be the leader?
>
>* Why he lie when he wrote that the working class is nearly non-existent in
>Peru because nearly all Peruvians (90%) are unemployed and that doesn't exist
>unions?
>
>* Why he openly wants to boycott and smash all the unions and the general
>strikes (a counter-revolutionary policy)? Only the mass actions and strikes
>could defeat Fujimori and not isolated elitist militarist actions against the
>will of the masses.
>
>* Why he said that Chiara was an agent which deserve to be kill? why is
>correct to support the sectarian killings of members of all left parties in
>Peru?
>
>* Why the PCP-SL is against workers councils and militias and against a
>workers revolution, and why it is in favour of a government whit the
>national bourgeoisie?
>
>* What proof does he have that Gonzalo is ten meters under the ground and is
>not actively supporting a "peace" capitulation to the regime (something that
>every peruvian with some knowledge of the political situation knows very well
>is truth)?
>
>* etc., etc.
>
>The only thing that Olaechea answers is in the question of the Ecuador-Peru
>war. He claims that Poder Obrero is slandering the PCPSL because they didn't
>support the defence of the Peruvian borders. So, that means that he accepts
the
>rest of our criticisms!
>
>As Malecki said Olaechea only reproduced a leaflet which he wrote in London
>which is *not* the position of the PCPSL in Peru.
>
>In Peru we produced a leaflet calling for the revolutionary defeatism in
>both sides and for a socialist federation of Peru, Ecuador and the region.
None
>of these demands were in the Olaechea leaflet, because he *Opposed* them.
>
>For him in Peru and Ecuador we should not fight for a socialist revolution.
The
>PCPSL is for a BOURGEOIS new democratic revolution which would create a new
>BOURGEOIS "popular" republic. The PCPSL is AGAINST  socialist revolution also
>because they call for the destruction of the organs which would make that
>revolution (such as the unions, councils and militias). The PCPSL didn't call
>on the Ecuadorian workers to make strikes and councils against the war. In
>Olaechea's message they only ask the Ecuadorian workers to wait until the
PCPSL
>would take power in Peru.
>
>In Europe Olaechea has to make a more "internationalist" leaflet. In Peru they
>wrote nationalist positions. The PCPSL denounced Fujimori for preparing a war
>with the aim of killing the prisoners but also the PCPSL denounced Fujimori
for
>being incapable of defending the integrity of the Peruvian state. Lenin was
>against the defence of the integrity of Russia. He was for revolutionary
>defeatism in both sides and for a socialist federation of the region!
>
>In Olaechea's leaflet it is possible to read:  "That is why, not only
>with Ecuador, but also with Chile, Bolivia, Colombia and Brazil, the rotten
old
>Peruvian state adopted a policy of *concessions*. They turned a blind eye and
>allowed military garrisons from those countries to enter Peruvian territory."
>
>In Peru they directly accused Fujimori of allowing Ecuador to
>rape Peruvian territory. The PCPSL promised to protect the borders.
>
>Today Gonzalo is advocating the necessity to produce a peace agreement with
the
>state.
>
>_________________________________
>jplant at cix.compulink.co.uk
>
>
>
>     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>



     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---




More information about the Marxism mailing list