Sanctimonious Orwellian snitch cops out and cries foul

hariette spierings hariette at easynet.co.uk
Sun Oct 13 10:18:31 MDT 1996


>More appalling bluster and slime from Adolfo:
>
>>What about a "poll" in Conway Hall, or in a workers rally, Rodwell?  It is
>>not the number of accounts that the Fujimori regime can hire in this list to
>>spread his manure that matters.  It is what the living and real masses would
>>to to jerks like you once they are made aware of their agent provocateur and
>>wind-bag for hire nature at the service of the counter-revolution.
>>
>>That would give you a good measure of the real state of conscious working
>>class public opinion, and face you with the reality of your political
>>bankruptcy.  Debate with spivs like you is already useless.  Criticism of a
>>more direct kind is what we challenge you to face up to now! Up until the
>>moment you can summon the courage to face it, and since you continue to
>>slander the revolution, I am perfectly justified to call you an Orwellian
>>snitch as much as I like, you sanctimonious little Lord Flaunteroy of the
>>aristocracy of Labour!.
>>
>>
>>Adolfo
>>
>>
>>Are you now, like that other "working class hero" J. Plant, also leave a "in
>>case I should be run over by the number 75 red bus - arrest Adolfo" kind of
>>postumous snitch note behind?
>
>
>Nothing justifies the disgraceful cynicism and lightheadedness with which
>Adolfo accuses everybody who disagrees with him of being agents in the pay
>of the class enemy. His methods are rotten to the core.
>
>JJ didn't challenge Adolfo to a Hell's Angels shootout, he challenged him
>to a public debate on the situation in Peru. Adolfo is not responding
>seriously to the challenge. He is chickening out of a public debate.
>
>He threatened to put an icepick through my skull a few weeks back, and then
>claimed this was a joke. Well, the joke and the joker are on record.
>
>Worse than Adolfo's ravings, however, is the silent complicity of too many
>subscribers on the list. Not to mention the open support he gets from some
>quarters that claim to have a serious relationship to Marxism and the
>scientific study of society in its economic and historical development.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Hugh
>
>PS The infantile mailbombing by Jay Miles at detcom, who obviously has
>connection money to burn, is an example of the methods of argument resorted
>to by these cornered rats.
>


Sweet dreams, Rodwell, you are nothing but a sanctimonious ninny missing his
nany!




     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---




More information about the Marxism mailing list