spectres at innotts.co.uk
Fri Sep 20 19:20:09 MDT 1996
Rakesh raises some interesting point about biotechnology.
One of the things that puzzles me is the copy-writing/patenting of genes.=
Once a researcher has identified a particular gene (such as the one that =
'causes' breast cancer), they have the right to patent it. The gene is =
not altered but discovered, and the discoverer then holds the rights to =
all future work on that gene. This seems absurd to me. Even by the most =
perverse logic of commodity fetishism it appears to be a rip-off!
Are there any other legal equivalents in property law?
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism