Volume limited lists?

Louis N Proyect lnp3 at columbia.edu
Fri Sep 27 15:57:09 MDT 1996


Louis: Don't worry, you zombie. Pretty soon he's going to be on a
moderated list --just like the Unity list-- and then he won't have to
worry about the cost as much.



On Fri, 27 Sep 1996, Hugh Rodwell wrote:

> >In-Reply-To: <v01540b01ae6fef30e503@[130.244.120.128]>
> >Hugh opined :
> >
> >>. Volume and disapproval can be managed with the delete key
> >
> >Not entirely. Volume determines cost (for those who pay their own
> >bills that is). Consequently those who have a mysterious ability to
> >post large volumes acquire the ability to make the list too expensive
> >for poor, unemployed working class people such as myself.
> >
> >_________________________________
> >jplant at cix.compulink.co.uk
>
> Can't you get a flat-rate subscription? Only phone charges, no traffic
> charges? With such a subscription it really is just a matter of downloading
> for the cost of a local call of some minutes, then uploading for even
> shorter periods. At least as far as a list like this is concerned. Surfing
> is another kettle of fish, but that's not a list problem.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugh
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>
>



     --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---




More information about the Marxism mailing list