Sartre

George Pennefather poseidon at SPAMtinet.ie
Thu Aug 12 07:35:55 MDT 1999



Tahir:
>That there have been theoretical weaknesses in the SACP for
>a very long time, and Chris Hani, wonderful and exemplary
>man that he was, did not provide an exception to this any
>more than Joe Slovo did. The 'black republic thesis' that
>was originally formulated by SA communists together with
>Bukharin and others in the Soviet Union in the twenties was
>taken up in a very degenerated form in the SACP as the
>'internal colonialism' thesis or 'colonialism of a special
>type'. Without going into detail here, what was wrong with
>it was it led to a notion of the national democratic
>revolution which was almost purely racial and had very
>little anti-imperialist content.

I see that no matter how compelled we feel to sweep early Soviet history
under the rug, it keeps cropping up. Even Jon Flanders, who took time away
from replacing pistons on a diesel locomotive, mused on the similarities
between nostalgia for Stalin and nostalgia for Hoffa. This after
complaining about how a discussion on Stalin vs Trotsky is the last thing
we need to hear.

Unfortunately, the SACP encapsulates all of the problems of a "stagist"
conception of socialist revolution that originated under Kautsky/Plekhanov
and reared its ugly head after the Popular Front turn.

When I was at ANC hq in Lusaka, Zambia in January 1990 doing some technical
consulting, I got a pretty good idea of the outlook of Communists in the
ANC. At the lower ranks, there was very little question that these were
dedicated revolutionists who deeply believed that an ANC victory in South
Africa would lead almost immediately to a socialist revolution. They also
were very interested in Nicaragua and the Cuban revolution since the
Central American revolution had not yet gone completely down the toilet. It
would in a few months after the FSLN got voted out of office.

When I met with Thabo Mbeki, I had a totally different impression. He drove
a BMW and lived in an elegant house in an upper class neighborhood. Even
though he was reputed to be a CPer, I got the distinct impression that he
was more interested in "modernizing" South Africa than anything else. That
was why my organization interested him. We could be a source of
high-technology expertise.

All of these people, including Mbeki, were operating from the most lofty
principles. They would go to any length to ensure that black South Africans
had the same rights as white South Africans. They were radical democrats.
Furthermore, it was correct for the international left to offer them
solidarity. But what was not on the agenda in South Africa, and never was,
was overthrowing the capitalist system. Jim Hillier, who is the moderator
of the pro-Stalin marxist-leninist list on egroups.com, wrote a long bitter
attack on the SACP on the Marxism-International list. The essence of his
attack is that Joe Slovo and company had abandoned the sound revolutionary
principles of Joseph Stalin. Yet if you examine the history of the South
African Communist Party with scholarly impartiality, you will discover that
the sole goal was to realize the "national revolution". To realize this
goal, it would be necessary to establish links with the progressive
bourgeoisie.

David Welch suggested the other day that such collaboration was not
inconsistent with socialist revolution and pointed to the 5-star flag of
the Chinese CP (where's Henry Liu now that we need him). What this fails to
take into account was that Mao had ZERO use for the Chinese bourgeoisie. If
anything, that whole multi-class schema was a clever ruse. If you read
Maurice Meisner's excellent history of Chinese economics and politics since
Mao, you will discover that Mao was intent on making a socialist revolution
from the very beginning. Mao was NOT a "stagist".





Louis Proyect

(http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)









More information about the Marxism mailing list