Borba100 at SPAMaol.com Borba100 at SPAMaol.com
Wed Dec 1 09:28:55 MST 1999

i am writing  a refutation of an "Illumanati" variation on the Protocols of
Zion horseshit.  This is being pushed now among Slavs as a covert effort to
deflect anger at obvious campaign to put them under Turkish/funademntalist
flunkies of US - to divert anger at that onto a Jewish Banker conspiracy,
blah blah balh.  Anybody got anything to offer?  One or two extreme factual
errors is all I need - the general points I can make.  This is VERY
important; it will be read by all of Serbian people on-line and probably get
translated into Russian.  Amazing. 1905 revisited.

Note: Please don't waste time "refuting" his attacks on socialism, the French
reovlution, etc., which are simply ludicrous.  The ONLY thing of relevance
here is the attack on Jews as being the financial elite - which alas has
credibility among even some calling themselves communists.  What I need is
some factual material on the power of Rosthchilds, and other ECONOMIC claims
he makes.  The rest I can wipe the floor with.  (And don';t estimate the
power of this horseshit - it really does sound ludicrous.  So did Mein Kampf.

Best Jared

The horseshit follows:

>- Most people have heard something about a New
>World Order.  Some have even read tomes about it.  But few people that I
>have met can explain succinctly what it is.  As a writer, analyst of global
>geopolitical affairs, political commentator, and public speaker I often
>come across people who use the term the "New World Order" but are at a loss
>to explain what it is.  If asked to do so, they tend to stutter, "it's… um…
>you know… ah… isn't it something that started well but turned out badly?"
>Well, sort of.  Kind of like Hitler's Third Reich.  It also promised to
>deliver a New World Order.  Literally.  If in doubt, just check out some of
>the Nazi era posters around Belgrade (1941).  And Hitler's NWO also started
>well - for the downtrodden German people, starving and humiliated by
>victorious and arrogant WW I allies.  But it ended badly, both for the
>German people and for millions of others around the world.
>The Bolsheviks also tried to build their version of a "new world order,"
>marketed globally as Communist International, and using slogans such as,
>"workers of the world unite."
>But the quest for "new world orders" dates much further back than Hitler,
>Lenin or Stalin.  In fact, it goes as far back as one man's ambition to
>rule another man's life.  Niccolo Machiavelli, for example, wrote in
>"Prince" (1513): "There is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of
>success, nor more dangerous to manage, than a creation of a new order of
>But since power-hungry, would-be rulers of the world - from Genghis Khan,
>to Attila the Hun, to Napoleon, to… rarely pay attention to the words of
>the wise, or bother to learn from history, they tend to repeat it.  Usually
>at their own peril.  Which is why every variation of a "new world order"
>tends to crumble eventually, invariably ending up in the dustbin of history.
>The New World Order (NWO) of the 1990s, therefore, is nothing more than the
>latest marketing mask which uses positive words to cover up evil designs of
>the western NWO architects.  The words, "New World Order," were first
>uttered in the contemporary context by the American president George Bush
>in 1990, when he exulted over the West's supposed victory in the Cold War
>with the Soviet Union.  His words offered hope ("new") for a better life
>("world") ahead; one which would be based on (law and) "order," rather than
>on raw exercise of power, which the Kremlin's "East Side Gang" used in its
>spheres of influence and control.
>Instead, the latest edition of the NWO delivered same old "gun diplomacy"
>which the Soviets used, only using bigger guns and more diplomacy to mask
>the West Side Gang's grab for power.  Like the Kremlin-based Soviet East
>Side Gang, the Wall Street-driven West Side Gang of globalist marauders,
>markets itself under the slogan, "world trade through world peace."  Which
>is a cover for its real motto - "perpetual commerce through perpetual war."
>Iraq was their first victim.  It was followed Somalia, Haiti, Croatia,
>Bosnia, Chechnya, Albania, Kosovo, Serbia, Sudan, Afghanistan, East Timor…
>among some NWO neo-colonial military interventions or civil war
>provocations.  Scores of other countries around the world surrendered their
>national sovereignties to the NWO voluntarily or surreptitiously, after
>their quisling leaders took the bait of NWO dollars and "reforms," a cover
>term for NWO vassals' silver noose.
>But "who is who" and "what is what" in this New World Order of the
>1990s?  They say picture is worth a thousand words.  So we invite you to
>build a graphic image of the NWO, an NWO quilt, its modern day flag, if you
>wish, with our help.  All you need to do is click on the URL
>http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins99/tim99-11-4.html , then read the
>text and click on instructions to access other images.
>Origins of certain powerful individuals' thirst to rule the world in modern
>times can be traced back to the late 18th century.  Many people have
>written on the subject of the so-called "Illuminati" ("Enlightened"), for
>example, but perhaps the most succinct summary of their activities in the
>last two centuries can be found in a 1965 speech given by a journalist and
>playright, Myron Fagan.  The speech was was recorded and has since sold
>millions of copies.  (The entire speech can be both read and heard at:
>http://www.ptialaska.net/~swampy/fagan/fagan_0.html ).  Here's an excerpt:
>"This satanic plot (New World Order/One World Government) was launched back
>in the 1760s when it first came into existence under the name 'Illuminati'
>('Enlightened').  This Illuminati was organized by one Adam Weishaupt, born
>a Jew, who converted to Catholicism and became a Catholic priest. At the
>behest of the then newly organized House of Rothschild, Weishaupt defected
>(Catholicism) and organized the Illuminati.
>Naturally, the Rothschilds financed that operation and every war since
>then, beginning with the French Revolution.  The headquarters of the great
>conspiracy in the late 1700's was in Frankfurt, Germany where the House of
>Rothschild had been established by Mayar (or Mayer) Amschel who adopted the
>Rothschild name and linked together other international financiers who had
>literally sold their souls to the devil.
>After the Bavarian government's exposure in 1786 (of the Illuminati's
>intent to start the French Revolution), the conspirators moved their
>headquarters to Switzerland, then to London."
>As is the case with unscrupulous bankers and industrialists whose only
>motive is Greed, Rothschilds have reportedly sometimes financed both sides
>of a war.  Such as in the case of WW II and Hitler's Third Reich, for
>example, another one of their early proteges.  Nor were they alone among
>the Jewish bankers in doing so, according to Fagan.
>It was certainly a winning strategy for war profiteers with no
>morals.  They win no matter who loses the war.  But only in a material
>sense.  Just as the "death merchants" and their financiers of the wars of
>the 1990s did.  Meanwhile, back to Fagan…
>"Since World War II (after Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild's (errand) boy in
>America, who organized and funded the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia), the
>headquarters of the American branch has been in the Harold Pratt Building
>in New York City, and the Rockefellers, originally proteges of Schiff, have
>taken over the manipulation of finances in America for the Illuminati…
>They have been promoting the Illuminati operating under various names and
>guises. I say under various names and guises because after the Illuminati
>was exposed and became notorious (and thus ineffective as a secret
>society), Weishaupt and his (subsequent) co-conspirators began to operate
>under various other names.
>In the United States, immediately after World War I, they set up what they
>called the 'Council on Foreign Relations,' commonly referred to as the
>CFR.  This CFR is actually the Illuminati in the United States and its
>Well, you may choose to believe all of Mr. Fagan's facts, or you may
>not.  But the formation of the United Nations after the WW II, in which the
>Rockefellers played a major part, including securing a New York City
>property for its headquarters, is at least one of the undisputed historical
>facts.  The U.N.'s blue colors helped masked its real "red" (commie)
>totalitarian agenda.
>Although run entirely by unelected officials appointed at the behest of the
>would-be NWO rulers, this globalist House of Ill-repute has been financed
>entirely by the world's taxpayers.  Including its various tentacles, such
>as the IMF, the World Bank or the World Trade Organizations.
>And yet, did anyone anywhere in the supposedly "free and democratic" world
>of the West ever ask the taxpayers what they thought of this reincarnation
>of the Communist Internationale, and if they wanted to fund it?
>No, Sireee…  Not that I've heard.
>We've had referenda on just about anything; ranging from the sex lives of
>fruit flies, to public transit choices; to selecting the various forms of
>government.  But NEVER EVER (!) have we been asked to vote by our
>"democratic" governments on whether or not we should be, or should have
>been paying, for the U.N. for all these years.
>Ever wondered why not?  Those who haven't (i.e., the taxpayers had never
>contemplated such travesties of our liberties, and such a brazen picking of
>our pockets)… well, they and their offspring could be the model NWO
>citizens of the future.
>But those who did wonder why not, must have realized that the formation of
>the U.N. in 1945 was the penultimate achievement of the West Side Gang.  It
>was a pinnacle which had eluded their cruder, less perfidious, but no less
>brutal, Kremlin-based East Side brethren.  Who were coerced into joining
>the U.N. party for a while.  Until they "lost" the "Cold War" to a more
>perfidious gang.  And the U.N. became a mere fig leaf for the West Side
>Gang's colonial ambitions.
>No wonder the communist aparachiks, such as Serbia's president, Slobodan
>Milosevic, were also on board with the UN/NWO elite for a while. In a
>November 1993 article titled "Plutocracy Is Alive and Well in America," I
>quoted something Milosevic said to me during our first meeting at his
>office in Belgrade in January 1990.  Here's an excerpt:
>"I remember meeting (David) Rockefeller as well as (Larry) Eagleburger (the
>former U.S. Secretary of State) at a gala party to mark the opening of our
>New York branch," this former Belgrade banker told me nearly four years ago
>(i.e., in Jan/90).  "And even though Eagleburger was an important
>government official, while Rockefeller was 'only' a businessman, I noticed
>that Eagleburger called Rockefeller 'Sir,' while Rockefeller called
>Eagleburger 'Larry'."[…]
>"It takes one to know one," goes the old saw.  Maybe the power-thirsty
>Communist banker, who bullied his way into Serbian presidency, figured out
>who really runs the American plutocracy masquerading as democracy - the men
>and women from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral
>Commission (TLC)."
>"David Rockefeller, the 'Sir' in the Milosevic-Eagleburger conversation, is
>sort of the 'Big Cheese,' the grand patriarch of the American foreign
>policy, who 'owns' people around him.  Using the CFR and the TLC as
>instruments of power, Rockefeller and his associates have nearly all the
>political and media bases covered.  In the end, it does not matter whether
>Republicans or the Democrats win.  Either way, it will be the (Rockefeller)
>'insiders' who will run the show in Washington.
>(Which makes) the 'world's greatest democracy' a little more than an
>intra-squad competition with the score always predetermined by the 'Big
>Cheese' and his cohorts.  It's like a 'Yankees' blue team v. the 'Yankees'
>white squad playing for the World Series title.  The 260 million Americans
>are merely the 'extras' who fill the stands, and even pay (taxes) for the
>privilege of watching the charade!
>"If Milosevic had figured all this out (in the 1980s), it could help
>explain why he treated the U.S. government representatives, like Warren
>Zimmermann, the former U.S. ambassador to Yugoslavia, for example, or
>Lawrence Eagleburger, the former Secretary of State, with such
>disdain.  Unlike most Americans, Milosevic may have realized that he was
>dealing with mere minions, not with men of power," I said in that November
>1993 article.
>Ladies and gentlemen, the preceding lines were written more than six years
>ago.  Yet they are every bit as true today, if not more so, as they were in
>November 1993.
>But any student of globalism must also watch the moves of the Bilderberger
>Group, formed in 1954, and named after a Dutch hotel in Oosterbeek, at
>which the first meeting of this global-international international elite.
>Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, at the time an important figure in the
>oil industry who held major positions in Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell Oil),
>and in Société Générale de Belgique, a powerful global banking corporation,
>was the key European sponsor of the Bilderberger idea.  The Rockefeller
>family, whose Standard Oil and its offshoots was technically a competitor
>of Shell, co-sponsored the idea from the American side.
>No wonder, therefore, that right from day one, the Bilderberger agenda
>reflected first and foremost the interests of the oil industry.
>By the way, it was at the Bilderberger's 1996 meeting at a resort near
>Toronto (King City), that the fate of Kosovo was sealed, according to John
>Whitley, a British-born political analyst abd Bilderberger watcher who now
>makes his home in Toronto (see S99-23, Day 10, Update 2, Item 3, Apr.
>2).  Whitley said that that's where the German government was given the
>lead assignment of creating, training and equipping the Kosovo Liberation
>Army, of which no one had heard before. […]
>So the fact that Milosevic, an erstwhile Rockefeller protégé, knew who the
>boss of the NWO was, yet chose to bite the hand which fed him, and put all
>his political eggs in the losing Kremlin communist basket, only goes to
>show us how badly versed the Serbian president is in world affairs.
>Meanwhile, here's a quick "NWO Quiz" for YOU.  Name four individuals who
>are members of all three leading globalist organizations - the CFR, the
>Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergers.
>Answer: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton and Lou Gerstner,
>IBM chairman.
>Do you now see which end us up in world affairs?
>But the global R&R duo, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, the Rex and
>the Regina of the New World Order, could not project their power through
>the above no-longer-so-secret societies without the help of the "Princes of
>the 20th Century," the leaders of the multinational corporations who stand
>to benefit the most from globalism and totalitarianism which it
>entails.  Enter the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, the four prongs of the
>New World Order - the "Death Merchant"-Gangsters, the Banksters, the
>Pranksters and the Hucksters.
>Here's a sampling of the "Death Merchant-Gangsters," for example.  Keep in
>mind that in this case, as with the other three prongs of the NWO Princes,
>the names of the companies shown are only a representative sample.  The
>power of the Princes is by no means limited to just those
>multinationals.  This blight on mankind's truth and liberty involves
>hundreds, if not thousands, of such Princes and Princesses.
>And here are some of the representatives Banksters…
>And some of the typical Pranksters, companies which are in the business of
>exporting the NWO's materialistic way of life.
>Finally, here are some of the Hucksters, the globalist establishment media
>organizations without whose shameless lies and denials the NWO's
>self-serving deception of the gullible mankind could never be carried out.
>Putting it all together… here's the TiM version of our just stitched up New
>World Order quilt.  Or the NWO flag, if your prefer.
>As you have heard us say it before, the NWO creed is: "I believe in
>nothing!" Its symbol: The Almighty Dollar. Or the Euro. Or… whatever other
>currency is in vogue. Its object of worship: The Golden Calf. Its holy
>shrine: Wall Street. Its motto: "Perpetual commerce through perpetual war."
>NOTE: To cancel the e-mail editions of our reports, just reply REMOVE or
>UNSUBSCRIBE, followed by your e-mail address.

More information about the Marxism mailing list