Fwd: Re: Individualism in Marx
CharlesB at SPAMCNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us
Wed Sep 1 09:25:31 MDT 1999
>>> Chris Matthew Sciabarra <cms10 at is2.nyu.edu> 08/31/99 08:59PM
I think we need to realize that the effects of Rand's work on political
culture are subtle, and it is difficult to say in the long-run. Marxism
has had a 150 year start on this score; Rand is dead since 1982, and it is
going to be a long time to begin seeing its effects on the kinds of
politics it has produced. I do think that she surely influenced the
movements away from central planning, but so did Hayek and Mises.
Charles: I'm hoping my influence in changing the world is subtle right now too.
Are you saying Hayek and Mises' influence is subtle too ? Anyway, I am trying to
influence things in the opposite way of Hayek and Mises, that is , in favor of central
planning. What is it in Rand or the others that makes you think central planning is
not the best goal ? Seems anti-dialectical , given that Marxist planning derives
directly from the Marxist critique of the bourgeois anti-holistic, anti-dialectical
conceptions of economy, the contradiction between social production and private
appropriation and the resulting anarchy of production, when enterprises all have a
different plan and are not coordinated.
Seems to me that Marx's influence 17 years after his death was a lot less subtle than
Rand's. In fact, Marx's influence in 1848 with The Manifesto was so unsubtle that he
was exiled from Germany, Belgium and France.
More information about the Marxism