A reading list for Anthony
CharlesB at SPAMCNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us
Sat Dec 2 12:23:54 MST 2000
>>> farmelantj at juno.com 11/25/00 11:33AM >>>
Quite so! I think that Lou confuses the fact that capitalism in order to
and displace earlier modes of production necessarily had to evolve into
a world system with the notion that it was such a system at its origins.
IMO that was not the case. While may disagree with Brenner over which
nation capitalism originated in, the fact remains it had to begin through
a nation. I think that Alan Carling's warning that in such discussions
we must make a distinction between the question of the origins of
capitalism as a mode
of production and the question of its subsequent reproduction - that is
survival and/or expansion in relation to other modes of production - is
most relevant here. (See Alan Carling, "The Strength of Historical
Materialism: A Comment," Science & Society (Spring 1994),
CB: However , the altneratives are not necessarily "a nation" and "a world system"
for the physical locus of the origin of capitalism. Capitalism could originate in
relations of production in England ( lords, peasants and bourgeoisie) and
Portugal-Africa , et al.( slaveowners, slaves, colonialists) BOTH. This is more than
"a" nation and less than a world system.
More information about the Marxism