Doug Henwood/Mark Jones exchange (from LBO-Talk)
Julio Fernández Baraibar
julfb at SPAMsinectis.com.ar
Mon May 1 00:48:07 MDT 2000
It is exctly this kind of byzantine discussion what has converted marxism in
a new scholasticism.
Nestor didn't say only what this purist critiquer states here. He has been
writing to the list about every kind of political, economic and
philosophical questions and in none case it has seemed that he has some sort
of moralizing-idealistic desviation. He says here only that capitalism is
also a social system based upon
a negative human drive.
To discuss about this is waste of time and stupid. None of us is proudhonist
----- Original Message -----
From: Ulhas Joglekar <ulhasj at bom4.vsnl.net.in>
To: <marxism at lists.panix.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 1:58 PM
Subject: Doug Henwood/Mark Jones exchange (from LBO-Talk)
> Nestor has described capitalism as "a social system based upon
> a negative human drive". IMHO capitalism is not a system BASED
> on a human drive. Capitalism is certainly characterised by a 'drive'
> for capital accumulation, which 'drive' is based on the relations of
> production SPECIFIC to the capitalist mode of production.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky <gorojovsky at inea.com.ar>
> To: <marxism at lists.panix.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 7:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Doug Henwood/Mark Jones exchange (from LBO-Talk)
> > a social system based upon a negative human drive
> > cannot last forever. Why does such an elementary idea generate
> > reactions is a mystery to me.
> > Or it is not.
> > Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
> > gorojovsky at inea.com.ar
More information about the Marxism