Red Ken outrage
ckromm at SPAMmindspring.com
Fri May 12 15:00:07 MDT 2000
Livinstone = Gulliani and Wilson? Seperately or combined?
I never did take you seriously, but it's even harder now.
----- Original Message -----
From: red-rebel <red-rebel at supanet.com>
To: <marxism at lists.panix.com>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Red Ken outrage
> But the whole point of the "carping" is that Ken Livingstone is no more a
> "Red" than Rudolph Gulliani or Pete Wilson.
> If you support Ken, you support capitalism and imperialism, just as he
> A Capitalist is a Capitalist. (And from what I hear about Kens stocks &
> shares fortune, he's as big a capitalist as any!)
> James Tait.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M A Jones <jones118 at lineone.net>
> To: <marxism at lists.panix.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Red Ken outrage
> > Chris Kromm wrote:
> > > You Brits have no idea how funny you sound arguing about whether Red
> > is
> > > a sellout. What would we give to have anything even resembling a "red"
> > mayor
> > > in ANY U.S. city!
> > Well, that's just my argument against the backbiters and carpers. I
> > Ken.
> > Carpe diem.
> > Mark Jones
> > http://www.egroups.com/group/CrashList
More information about the Marxism