Foster on Hardt-Negri
g_schofield at dingoblue.net.au
Tue Dec 4 17:48:56 MST 2001
Louis, this review article is very interesting (http://www.monthlyreview.org/1201jbf.htm) by JOHN BELLAMY FOSTER.
The Foster clearly does not like "Empire" very much, indeed there is much to dislike in it and contrasts it with Meszaros' new book "SOCIALISM OR BARBARISM", inrterestingly subtitled "From the American Century to the Crossroads" (which I have not read but hope to soon do so). I think most might agree that Meszaros is no lightwieght, whatever the thoughts on Negri and Hardt.
The points outlined in the review attributed to Meszaros seem all very substantial:
"Imperialism, he says, can be divided into three distinct historical
phases: (1) early modern colonialism, (2) the classic phase of
imperialism as depicted by Lenin, and (3) global hegemonic
imperialism, with the U.S. as its dominant force. "
Simplifing this to 1)pre-Imperialism 2) Imperialism 3) Super-imperialism would be in accord with Lenin's thesis - afterall what could Global Hegemonic Imperialism otherwise mean?
Despite Foster's effort there is a discordant note in this, Meszaro seems to be putting the same general conclusion as Negri/Hardt.
--- Message Received ---
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3 at panix.com>
To: marxism at lists.panix.com
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 08:50:26 -0500
Subject: Foster on Hardt-Negri
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
More information about the Marxism