double standard: Re: Leo Panitch on 9/11
mark.jones at tiscali.co.uk
Sun Dec 9 09:33:19 MST 2001
merely asserting that someone is dogmatic doesn't get us very far. A
productive contribution would be a logical reasoned defence of Panitch's
conception of 'democratic renewal' for example; if you can't or won't do
this yourself perhpas you can get Leo Panitch himself to do it on an open
forum like this is. Or is the net just too plebeian for professorial
social-democrats to risk?
At 09/12/2001 16:26, you wrote:
>Different protocols for different people. When Lou tells me the word shit
>or fuck is over the top then i will make the necessary adjustments. Henry
>is dogmatic...so I will not retreat from that.
>At 06:47 PM 08/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>I am protesting Travis' use of language of in this exchange with Henry. she
>>(or he) should stop using phrases like "dogmatic shit", "nonsense",
>>"fucking revolution". it is just not comradely.
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
More information about the Marxism