Gorojovsky at arnet.com.ar
Tue Jun 19 05:33:16 MDT 2001
En relación a Re: exploitation (Dayne),
el 19 Jun 01, a las 9:46, Greg Schofield dijo:
> The pertinent bit is that it can easily be read two ways; 1) that is there is no
> worker's party because they gaily share in the feast or; 2) they share in the
> feast because there is no workers party
I guess a materialist would opt for explanation (1).
However, it is obvious that the ways in which the Western proletariat is co-
opted by the imperialist bourgeoisie can be multiple _except for_ a final cut
in extraction of surplus value. And this is the basic point here. Workers in
the First World are exploited (in a sense, _more_ exploited than most -
absolutely not all- workers in the Third World) and this exploitation is a
qualitative issue, not a quantitative one.
It is hard, however, not to take into consideration the fact that the _reality_
of plunder abroad and redistribution within frontiers is an important
_material_ element in the formation of working class consciousness in the core.
Most forms of working class racism stem from this concrete fact.
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky at arnet.com.ar
More information about the Marxism