xxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Wed Mar 14 19:38:37 MST 2001
Robert Nozick must be an economic libertarian (in the tradition of Mises
and Hayek). I never thought of him as being an anarchist in the leftist
libertarian sense, but there is a logical connection, of course..
Kimlika's (pro ?) book _Contemporary Political Theory_ compares the
libertarianism of Nozick with the liberalism of John Rawl, and their
concepts of disributive justice in a capitalist society. He touches upon
Marxian notions of justice as well A very good intro to the philosophical
debate on social equality.
At 08:07 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>[ bounced html format from MindAphid at aol.com ]
>In a message dated 3/14/01 4:37:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>schaffer at optonline.net writes:
> Sam Pawlett said:
> > In other words, anarchism is not an evolutionary stable
> > strategy. Nozick explained this in his book.
> what book is this?
> les schaffer
>Anarchy, State and Utopia, by Robert Nozick published by Basic Books,
>copyright 1974. I dont think Im going out on a limb to say it is
>essential reading if you want to understand how most economists view
>Marxian economic theory.
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
Department of Political Science
135 Western Avenue, Milne 102
Albany, NY, 12222
More information about the Marxism