[BRC-NEWS] Africans and Indians: Only in America

Louis Proyect lnp3 at SPAMpanix.com
Tue Mar 27 06:35:50 MST 2001


February 6, 2001

Africans and Indians: Only in America

By William Loren Katz <wlkatz at aol.com>

Alex Haley's successful tracking of Kunte Kinte gave the hunt for African
ancestors a needed shove foreward. But driven by their stubborn will and
searching eye, as researchers fanned out in pursuit of African connections,
another vision appeared. First as a recurring distraction, then a source of
wonder, geological detectives stumbled on Native American ancestors. Alex
Haley was hardly alone when he also discovered Native American roots to his
family tree.

Though often unmentioned except in family circles, this biological legacy
has been shared by such figures as Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King
Jr., Langston Hughes, Lena Horne, Alice Walker, Jesse Jackson, Michael
Jackson and L.L. Cool J. Today virtually every African American family tree
boasts an Indian branch.

This uniquely "only in America" relationship began with the earliest
foreign landings in the New World. From Nova Scotia to Cape Horn, and along
the jewel-like islands of the Caribbean, Europeans imposed a slave system
first on Native Americans. Then, as millions of Indian fell victim to
overwork, disease and brutality, kidnapped Africans began to take their

There in the misty dawn of the Americas two peoples of color began to meet
in slave huts, on tobacco and cotton plantations, and as workers in dank
mines. For two centuries Indians and Africans remained enslaved together,
and Native Americans were not exempted from the system until after the
Revolution. Scholar C. Vann Woodward has concluded "If the black-red
inter-breeding was anywhere as extensive as suggested by the testimony of
ex-slaves, then the monoracial concept of slavery in America requires

The African-Indian connection also adds a sharp new dimension to the issue
of slave resistance. The first evidence of Native American and African
unity appears in a l503 communication to Spain's King Ferdinand from
Viceroy Nicolas de Ovando of Spain's headquarters on Hispaniola, now Haiti.
Ovando complained that his enslaved Africans "fled among the Indians and
taught them bad customs and never could be captured." In the last four
words the governor is describing more than a problem with untrustworthy
servants or the difficulties of retrieving runaways in a rainforest. >From
his thin line of white colonies, he sees Europeans confronting a new
bi-racial enemy that has a base of support in the interior. The budding
coalition has new recruits joining each week.

In Suriname, on the northern coast of South America U.S. anthropologist
Richard Price lived among and recorded the origins of the Saramaka nation.
Beginning in the 1680s Saramakas combined Indians and Africans enslaved by
Europeans. Sacred Saramaka legends explained: "The Indians escaped first
and then, since they knew the forest, they came back and liberated the
Africans." This red hand of friendship extended to people of African
descent is an American tradition as deep and meaningful as the first
Thanksgiving. From Canada to Cape Horn, two peoples fled bondage, united as
husband and wife, brother and sister, mother and child, and formed a
military alliance.

Centuries before the Declaration of Independence talked of natural rights
and sanctioned rebellion against tyranny, African-Indian alliances acted on
these concepts as they pursued their American dream in the mountains beyond
the white settlements dotting the coastline. In 1537 Viceroy Mendoza of
Mexico, lamenting an insurrection by Africans, admitted "the Indians are
with them." As slave revolts rocked the new European outposts in the
Americas, they also enjoyed Native American support.

In hard-to-reach backwaters of the Americas, two people of color people
began to build their own "maroon" colonies. Some were outlaw bands, raiders
who preyed on whites, slaves and Indians alike, and lived a short, brutish
life. But other maroons depended on family farming and herding and built
peaceful relations and trade with Indian villages, slaves, and former masters.

European officials judged maroons, in the words of a French historian, "the
gangrene of colonial society." Their success as independent economic
societies refuted white claims of African inferiority. Each day Maroons
proved once slaves wrenched free they could govern themselves and prosper.
Further, maroon encampments served as beacons for discontented slaves in a
radius of a hundred miles, and stood as a clear and present danger to the
European conquest. Some whites saw maroons as a knife pressed against the
thin line of their rule, and they had a point.

In a clockwork of military and legal reflexes, European authorities sought
to eradicate Black Indian contacts and pit Red against Black. In l523 a
Royal Order to Hernando Cortez banned Africans from Indian villages.
"Division of the races is an indispensable [control] element" said a
Spanish officer. "Between the races we cannot dig too deep a gulf,"
announced a French official.

Well-trained European armies ordered to crush maroon colonies met their
match in distant mountains and jungles. "[Maroon] self-respect grows
because of the fear whites have of them," a white Brazilian wrote to King
Joao of Portugal in l719. Maroon songs resonated with victorious pride:

"Black man rejoice, White man won't come here.

And if he does, the Devil will take him off."

White commanders in resplendent uniforms met defeat and chose retirement in
distant European capitals.

Foreign soldiers had little stomach for warfare in the wilderness against
Black Indians, so Europeans hired or conscripted Indians. These were
experts in frontier warfare, but their loyalty was questionable. In 1732
Spanish officials in Venezuela threw 150 conscripted Indians and Africans,
and 100 white soldiers against Juan Andresote, a Black Indian, whom the
Spanish Crown saw as a business rival. When Adresote's guerrilla fighters
surrounded the invaders, their soldiers of color defected. Then, the musket
fire of Andresote's men finished the work, killing or wounding more than
half of the whites, as the rest scurried home.

Most maroon leaders were African-born, but after 1700 leadership
increasingly fell to those born to Black Indian marriages, people familiar
with European negotiations. Black women, in short supply, sometimes played
crucial roles in village life. In Amazonia, Brazil, Filippa Maria Aranha,
who ruled a thriving colony, so adroitly maneuvered her armed forces
against the Portuguese, there was no defeating her and Portugal granted her
people freedom, independence and sovereignty.

The largest American maroon settlement was the Republic of Palmares, a
three-walled city of 11,000 in northeastern Brazil. For almost the entire
l7th century Palmares' armies hurled back repeated Dutch and Portuguese
military expeditions. Finally, in 1794 Palmares was overrun, and according
to legend, its warriors, threw themselves over a cliff rather than surrender.

In 1920 Carter G. Woodson, the father of modern Black history, wrote that
in North America entire libraries were devoted to studies of the
relationship between Africans and Europeans and the relationship between
Native Americans and Europeans. But, said Dr. Woodson, the third part of
the American triangle remained unexplored. "One of the longest unwritten
chapters in the history of the United States is that treating of the
relations of the Negroes and the Indians." Woodson thought slaves "found
among the Indians one of their means of escape."

The very notion of "Black Indians" still has most whites shaking their
heads in disbelief or smiling at what appears to be a joke, an unlikely
play on words. No one remembers any such person in a school text, western
novel or Hollywood movie. None ever appeared. Even in African American
families Indian connections were occasionally mentioned, but not as part of
an historic process. Despite the vital role of remembrance for people of
color, a gallant heritage remained hidden.

As researchers traced African roots Indian connections could no longer be
ignored. In the 1920s Columbia University anthropologist Melville J.
Herskovits, renowned for documentation of African survivals in American
life, conducted interviews in New York, West Virginia and Washington, D.C.
which determined that a fourth to a third of African Americans had Indian
ancestors. Today in North American families the figure is closer to 95%.

Scholars have uncovered fascinating glimpses of the historic legacy. In
1622 the colony of Jamestown, Virginia was attacked by Native Americans but
Africans were spared. In 1763 during Pontiac's Indian uprising a Detroit
resident reported that Native Americans killed whites but were "saving and
caressing all the Negroes they take." He worried lest this might "produce
an insurrection." Chief Joseph Brant's Mohawks in New York welcomed runaway
slaves and encouraged intermarriage. Native American adoption systems knew
no color line and accepted the breathless fugitives as sisters and
brothers. Woodson's notion of an escape hatch notion proved correct: Indian
villages welcomed fugitives, and served as stations on the underground

Native Americans were proud people, but without prejudice, and lacked an
investment in slavery. Enslaved Africans near New Orleans fled to nearby
Natchez villages, and by 1723 a free Black man commanded Natchez
expeditions against the French. One Black Indian village, Natanapalle,
claimed 15 residents with 11 muskets and ammunition, and another band
camped across Lake Pontchartrain.

British racial policy relied on divide and rule. In 1721 most English
settlements denied entrance to Indians and ten years later whites in
Carolina who brought Blacks to frontier lands faced fines of 100 pounds.
Louisiana Governor Etienne de Perier, whose African slaves escaped and
united with Natchez Indians and in one raid destroy a French colony and
left 200 whites dead, warned this "union between the Indian nations and the
black slaves" could lead to "total loss" for his colony.

In British North America each treaty with Native Americans provided for the
return of runaways. In 1721 the Governor of Virginia made the Five Nations
promise to return all fugitives; in l726 the Governor of New York had the
Iroquois Confederacy promise; in l746 the Hurons promised and the next year
the Delawares promised. Compliance was another matter. According to scholar
Kenneth W. Porter none of these nations returned a slave. British officials
also offered staggering rewards to Indians who would hunt fugitives. In
Virginia price was 35 deerskins, and in the Carolinas it was three blankets
and a musket.

To finally seal off Native American villages and make Indians partners,
British merchants introduced Africans as slaves to the Five Nations -
Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks and Seminoles.

Though less than 3% of Indian people owned slaves, bondage created
destructive cleavages in their villages and promoted a class hierarchy
based on "white blood." Indians of mixed white blood stood at the top,
"pure" Indians next, and people mixed with of African descent were at the
bottom. In 1860 Indian populations figures over a 30-year period showed a
decline ranging from 20% to 40%, but the numbers of slaves had increased to
2,511 for the Cherokees, 2,344 for the Choctaws 1,532 for the Creeks and
975 for the Chickasaws. Slavery had become a major economic factor in each

Indian masters, however, rejected the worst features of southern white
bondage. Travelers reported enslaved Africans "in as good circumstances as
their masters." A white Indian Agent, Douglas Cooper, upset by the Native
American failure to practice a brutal form of bondage, insisted that
Indians invite white men live in their villages and "control matters."

Force, division and law threatened but failed to end Black- Indian
friendships. Thomas Jefferson discovered among the Mattaponies of Virginia
"more negro than Indian blood." The city of Los Angeles was founded in 1781
by forty-four people of whom all but two were African, Indian or a mixture
of the two peoples. In the 1830s frontier artist George Catlin described
"Negro and North American Indian, mixed, of equal blood" as "the finest
built and most powerful men I have ever yet seen."

Prominent whites, including Governor Perrier of Louisiana, claimed Indians
had "a great aversion" to Africans. But this was wishful thinking. In 1730
his Choctaw allies, captured dozens of Black runaways who had served as
military allies of the Natchez nation, but then refused to surrender them.
When the Africans were finally returned after 18 months, they boasted of
their freedom with the Natchez and the Choctaw. An angry Perrier reported
the returnees had a new "spirit of laziness, independence and insolence."

The greatest flowering and most militant expression of the Black-Indian
alliance took place in Florida. Enslaved Africans fled bondage in Georgia,
Mississippi, Alabama and the Carolinas to make a new life on the penninsula
claimed by Spain. Around the time of the American Revolution, Africans
welcomed the Seminoles, a breakaway segment of the Creek nation, to the
penninsula and taught them rice cultivation methods they had learned in
Sierra Leone and Senegambia. On this basis the two peoples formed an
agricultural and military alliance that defeated repeated invasions by U.S.
slaveholding posses.

Finally, in 1819, to end a perceived threat by U.S. slaveholders, the
United States purchased Florida. By this time African-run plantations
stretched for fifty miles along Florida's fertile Appalachicola river
valley, and included herds of cattle and horses. In Florida the Red and
Black Seminoles fought the United States Army, Navy and Marines to a
standstill for four decades, and some Seminoles never surrendered. In three
Seminole Wars the United States armed forces lost more than 1500 U.S.
soldiers, spent more than $40,000,000 and at times Seminole armed forces
tied up half of the U.S. Army on the peninsula. "This, you may be assured,"
said U.S. General Thomas Jesup in l837, "is a Negro, not an Indian war." It
was both.

Once away from European rule, African and Native American men and women
found they had more in common than a foe weilding muskets and whips.
Scholar Claude Levi-Strauss found both peoples had "precise knowledge" and
"extreme familiarity with their biological environment," and gave it
"passionate attention." Dr. Theda Perdue's study of the Cherokee nation
found that red and black people saw the spiritual and environmental as one,
and common activities such as rising in the morning, hunting and curing
illness as imbued with religious significance. Mountains and hills
represented divinities; people, animals and plants carried life's messages;
religion was not reserved for Sundays, but a matter of daily reflection.

Indians and Africans both sought to live harmoniously with nature,
cherished kinship, stressed cooperation and created economies based on
subsistence agriculture. Both peoples rejected pursuit of worldly
treasures, and allowed kinship rather than ownership to dictate economic,
social and judicial decisions and marital customs. Individual roles were
subservient to and flowed from transcendent community duties.

Analysis of faunal materials from a Black 18th century colony at Fort Mose,
Florida, by Dr. Jane Landers reveals that in their eating habits "Indian
and black villages resembled each other in many respects." Cherokee and
other Native American rulers, noted Perdue, governed not by obtuse legal
doctrines, but by an overarching, "friendly compact" members were born into
and agreed to follow. These societies contrasted with European models that
slashed the narrow ribbon of peace to pursue individual wealth and
regretted nothing but defeat.

By l860 African Americans has so thoroughly mixed with Native Americans
throughout the Atlantic seaboard, that white legislators wanted to revoke
their tax exemptions. In the Oklahoma Indian Territory 18% of the
Cherokees, Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles and Creeks were of African descent.

No less than in the North and South, the Civil War tore Indian nations
apart. Surrounded by Confederate troops and influenced by Confederate
Indian agents, most Native Americans in Oklahoma felt they had little
choice but follow the Confederacy. However, in November 1861 hundreds of
black and red Indians led by Creek Chief Opothle Yahola, fought three
pitched battles against Confederate whites and Indians to reach Union lines
in Kansas, and offer their services. With the defeat of the Confederacy and
its Indian allies, northerners sought revenge and the U.S. scrapped
existing treaties with Native American nations.

The Seminole nation made the most rapid adjustment to emancipation,
electing six Black members to its first post-war governing Council. Black
Seminoles began to build homes, churches, schools and businesses. Cherokees
and Creeks moved toward equality somewhat slower and Choctaws and
Chickasaws slower yet.

Whatever unfairness African Americans felt living among Indians, they knew
did not compare with what they could expect from southern whites. "The
opportunities for our people in that [Indian] country far surpassed any of
the kind possessed by our people in the U.S.," wrote editor O.S. Fox of the
Cherokee Afro-American Advocate. His people knew that they lived among
Indian men and women who would never brutalize or lynch their sons and

At the famous Congress of Angostura in l8l9, liberator Simon Bolivar was
elected President of Venezuela and planned a military course that would
eventually free the Americas of foreign rule. But he also took time to talk
of our racial history:

"It is impossible to say to which human family we belong. The larger part
of the native population has disappeared, Europeans have mixed with Indians
and the Negroes, and the Negroes have mixed with the Indians. We are all
born of one mother America, though our fathers had different origins. This
dissimilarity is of the greatest significance."

Many people of African descent found escape and some located their American
dream among Native Americans. Together two peoples of color became the
first freedom-fighters of the Americas. Their courageous contribution to
our legacy of resistance to tyranny deserves greater recognition.

Copyright (c) 2001 William Loren Katz. All Rights Reserved.

[IMPORTANT NOTE: The views and opinions expressed on this list are solely
those of the authors and/or publications, and do not necessarily represent
or reflect the official political positions of the Black Radical Congress
(BRC). Official BRC statements, position papers, press releases, action
alerts, and announcements are distributed exclusively via the BRC-PRESS
list. As a subscriber to this list, you have been added to the BRC-PRESS
list automatically.]

[Articles on BRC-NEWS may be forwarded and posted on other mailing lists,
as long as the wording/attribution is not altered in any way. In
particular, if there is a reference to a web site where an article was
originally located, do *not* remove that.

Unless stated otherwise, do *not* publish or post the entire text of any
articles on web sites or in print, without getting *explicit* permission
from the article author or copyright holder. Check the fair use provisions
of the copyright law in your country for details on what you can and can't do.

As a courtesy, we'd appreciate it if you let folks know how to subscribe to
BRC-NEWS, by leaving in the first seven lines of the signature below.]

BRC-NEWS: Black Radical Congress - General News Articles/Reports
Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo at tao.ca?body=unsubscribe%20brc-news>
Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo at tao.ca?body=subscribe%20brc-news>
Digest: <mailto:majordomo at tao.ca?body=subscribe%20brc-news-digest>
Help: <mailto:worker-brc-news at lists.tao.ca?subject=brc-news>
Archive1: <http://www.mail-archive.com/brc-news@lists.tao.ca>
Archive2: <http://groups.yahoo.com/messages/brc-news>
Archive3: <http://archive.tao.ca>
Post: <mailto:brc-news at lists.tao.ca>
<www.blackradicalcongress.org>  | BRC |  <blackradicalcongress at email.com>

Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

More information about the Marxism mailing list