A suggestion on what to discuss

Gorojovsky Gorojovsky at arnet.com.ar
Wed Sep 12 06:41:16 MDT 2001

Can we sum up, now?

Some among us believe that the events this morning were prepared by the high 
command of the American Empire in order to galvanize the American people for 
future engagement in a more unruly world scenario, an engagement which might 
imply huge masses of American GI's occupying foreign land.

Others believe that the events took the high command of the American Empire 
absolutely unawares, and that the coup on the self-confidence of the American 
bourgeoisie couldn't be harder. If I am not wrong, however, these also admit 
that, at least as an immediate perspective, the attacks will result in a strong 
rightwards turn of the American population.

Others (some siding to one general line, others siding to the other one) also 
agree, however, on the serious consequences that the events will have on 
popular consciousness in America.

I, for one, tend to pay good attention to the issues raised by Jared (maybe I 
would enlarge the interest a bit, thinking of somewhere else than the fSU and 
China). But I also accept that I might be wrong.

What I would like to stress is that we seem to be in full agreement as to what 
will happen in the consciousness of the masses (not to speak of the perilous 
period that is opening up right now). So, I suggest we center ourselves on the 
immediate tasks and leave the debate over the origin and trademark of the 
attacks for a less urgent future.

What do our American comrades think that can be done to forestall the 
chauvinistic, reactionary mood that seems to be bound to grip the American 
masses? Perhaps this debate may prove more fruitful.

Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky at arnet.com.ar
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message

More information about the Marxism mailing list