[PEN-L:17608] Re: Not good

Xxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Mon Sep 24 17:32:48 MDT 2001

> From: Mark Jones <mark.jones at tiscali.co.uk>
> To: pen-l at galaxy.csuchico.edu
> Cc: marxism at lists.panix.com
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L:17608] Re: Not good
> Date: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:12 PM
> At 24/09/2001 14:09, Tom Walker wrote:
> >I don't really mind when Doug riffs a cheap shot about gloating off one
> >my posts. I don't really mind when Doug doesn't respond to my
> >reply to his cheep shot. But when, after ignoring my reply, he fires off
> >cheap shot about catechism under the "not good" subject heading, it
hurts my
> >feelings.
> I think that particular cheap shot was directed at me. Doug, a one time
> self-professed marxist, now spends his time wondering aloud how leftwing
> economists can help capitalism get over its latest downturn.

Considering Doug is a social democract, why does he not *once* prepare a
*long* article and post it on pen-l, explaining where he exactly stands?
are cheap shot comments more time saving than an article?

Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx
Ph.D Student
Department of Political Science
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
Albany, NY 12222

PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message

More information about the Marxism mailing list