[PEN-L:17608] Re: Not good

Xxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Mon Sep 24 17:32:48 MDT 2001


----------
> From: Mark Jones <mark.jones at tiscali.co.uk>
> To: pen-l at galaxy.csuchico.edu
> Cc: marxism at lists.panix.com
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L:17608] Re: Not good
> Date: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:12 PM
>
> At 24/09/2001 14:09, Tom Walker wrote:
>
> >I don't really mind when Doug riffs a cheap shot about gloating off one
of
> >my posts. I don't really mind when Doug doesn't respond to my
substantive
> >reply to his cheep shot. But when, after ignoring my reply, he fires off
a
> >cheap shot about catechism under the "not good" subject heading, it
hurts my
> >feelings.
>
> I think that particular cheap shot was directed at me. Doug, a one time
> self-professed marxist, now spends his time wondering aloud how leftwing
> economists can help capitalism get over its latest downturn.

Considering Doug is a social democract, why does he not *once* prepare a
*long* article and post it on pen-l, explaining where he exactly stands?
are cheap shot comments more time saving than an article?

---
Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx
Ph.D Student
Department of Political Science
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
Albany, NY 12222



=======
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message



More information about the Marxism mailing list