Palestine's new guard

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Thu Apr 11 18:03:28 MDT 2002


The Nation
COMMENT | April 29, 2002

Palestine Militias Rising
by Graham Usher

Israel's latest military offensive in the West Bank, code-named
Defensive Wall, was met with fierce armed resistance, as Palestinians
fought house to house and sometimes hand to hand to repulse the
reconquest of their towns, villages and refugee camps. Some of the
young defenders are guerrillas from new Palestinian militias forged
by the intifada, others are Palestinian Authority police officers and
many are both.

"This is our Karameh," said one in Jenin. Karameh, a village on the
East Bank of the Jordan River, is the site of a battle fought between
the Israeli army and Palestinian guerrillas in March 1968. Although
the army took the village, the heroic resistance put up by the
Palestinians consecrated Yasir Arafat and his Fatah movement as the
undisputed leadership of the Palestinian cause. One year later Arafat
was elected chairman of the PLO. He converted the movement from a
front for Arab regimes into an authentic representative of
Palestinian nationalism.

Many believe a similar changing of the guard has occurred during the
eighteen months of the latest uprising, with leadership gradually
passing from a Palestinian Authority that once ruled over the
Palestinian areas to armed and cross-factional militias that now,
alone, defend them. Formed in the uprising's first months as a
defense against army and settler incursions, Fatah-led militias like
the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) in Gaza and the Al Aqsa
Brigades in the West Bank have seen their power and legitimacy soar
in inverse ratio to the collapse of the PA's governing and military
institutions after a wave of Israeli assaults. As a result, former
officers in PA police forces have swelled the militias' ranks.

This transformation has accelerated during Ariel Sharon's
premiership. Following his election in February last year--and with
Arafat's oblique blessing--the Palestinian armed factions united
behind one policy: to destroy Sharon by creating a "balance of
terror" with the occupation, a phrase borrowed from Hezbollah's
triumphant resistance to Israel's occupation in south Lebanon. "We
have to convince Israelis that whatever else Sharon brings them, it
won't be security," says Jamal Abu Samhandanah, a PRC leader.

The strategy has exacted a brutal toll. Nearly 2,000 Palestinians and
400 Israelis have been killed in the current conflict, as Sharon's
exclusively military solutions went from bombardment to reoccupation,
and Palestinian resistance went from guerrilla warfare in the
occupied territories to suicide bombings in Israel, executed recently
as much by Fatah as by the Islamists of Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

The politics of Palestine's new young guard is as inchoate as the
local militias that it comprises. But it opposes the PA-Israeli
security cooperation and US-led diplomacy of the Oslo peace process,
favoring instead armed struggle and alliances with the Arab world,
including the million or so Palestinian citizens of Israel. One
militia leader in Bethlehem said the most suitable response to
Israel's current assault would be "resistance in Israel's cities and
mayhem from the Galilee to Cairo."

Overwhelmingly from village and refugee backgrounds, the young guard
is critical of PA mismanagement and corruption and of an Oslo
leadership they believe reaped the spoils of the peace process
without delivering on Palestinian aspirations to statehood,
independence and Israeli withdrawal. But they are loyal to Arafat,
and rarely more so than now: The army's siege on the Palestinian
leader's compound in Ramallah is seen as a symbol of the plight of
every Palestinian. "We think Arafat and all the leaders around him
compromised too much in the negotiations. But as long as Sharon acts
against him, we will be with Arafat. We will not let Israel decide
the Palestinian leadership," says Samhandanah.

The young fighters are positioning for leadership in the post-Arafat
era, whether this comes through his natural demise or through forced
removal by Israel. The contours of the contest are already clear:
between the historic Oslo leadership that seeks a negotiated
settlement courtesy of US and international intervention, and a
resistance vowing that the intifada will end only with independence,
even if that means the destruction of what is left of the PA. Arafat
has maintained his leadership by balancing between the two wings; he
will side with the winner, say Palestinian analysts.

If Sharon succeeds in reimposing military rule throughout the
occupied territories, the Palestinian national leadership will revert
to what it was after Karameh, this time laced with a strong Islamist
current. It will be young, underground, armed, refugee-based, perhaps
more democratic and certainly more radical. It will take the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict back three decades, and perhaps further.
[The only wrong note in an otherwise interesting report. Perhaps
things are finally moving forward rather than backward.]

--
Louis Proyect, lnp3 at panix.com on 04/11/2002

Marxism list: http://www.marxmail.org



~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.



More information about the Marxism mailing list