Brown Man's Burden in Palestine [by myself]

Mohammad J Alam alam.m at
Tue Feb 26 11:34:37 MST 2002

M. Junaid Alam

Undergraduate of Political Science

Northeastern Univ., Boston MA

Anti-war activist

The Brown Man?s Burden [in Palestine]

It?s been over a hundred years since Rudyard Kipling penned the lines of
his famous poem, ?The White Man?s Burden?, in which he called for the
American white man to join his European compatriots in fulfilling a solemn
duty towards the inferiors. Kipling implored his countrymen to extend the
White Man?s deep sense of humanity and generosity to ?Half devil and half
child? heathens everywhere, by kindly plundering their lands and pillaging
their homes. Naturally, the goal was to unburden the savage of his property
and resources, thus relieving him of any discomfort. And even though the
White Man would be forced to increase his wealth and power as a most
unfortunate result, it was a sacrifice he had to make.

Today of course, this racist sentiment is unacceptable. Anyone who dares
promote this idea now would be castigated as a mindless reactionary.
Indeed, America no longer believes that whites are special, superior beings
that must heal the darker-skinned demons of the world with an ethereal
touch. We have evolved and developed quite a bit since those most primitive
days. Or so they say.

In reality, the mainstream media reports on American foreign policy-related
issues with the underlying assumption that Western ?civilized? countries
always act in accordance with unquestionable moral values. Nowhere is this
clearer than in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where America?s strongest
ally is always portrayed in a light so favorable it is truly blinding. But
instead of launching into an exposition of how the media paints Israel and
Jewish settlers with Orwellian brushstrokes, I will let the distortion
speak for itself.

It is often argued that Israel?s existence is constantly under threat by a
pack of enemies surrounding it on all sides. In specific reference to
Palestine, pundits always point to the denial of Israel?s right to exist by
extremist militants. . But what is the reactionary frothing of a few angry
sheikhs compared to Israel?s methodical policy of the last few decades:
military occupation, settlement expansion, and disproportionate violence on
the Palestinian populace?

For the tragedy of 1948, when 800,000 Palestinians were forcibly expelled
from their homes and hundreds more were massacred  in a terror campaign to
make room for Jewish settlers seeking to establish a state, there is not a
whisper of recognition in our media?apparently no one worries about
Palestinian desires for security. In 1967, when thousands more had their
homes torn down and their property stolen by Israel in an illegal
annexation of Jerusalem, there was no outcry over this pogrom either. And
in the last 16 months, when hundreds more homes have been demolished in the
refugee camps and over 2,000 Palestinian children have been left homeless
in the Occupied Territories, few ?experts? have raised a finger: a true
testament to the insensitivity of the American media to the Palestinians?

How absurd it is, then, to wax poetic about Israel?s existence being
supposedly ?endangered?, when in fact the Israelis, in possession of a
constantly-expanding, expropriating, and aggrandizing state with no defined
borders, increases her possession daily by carving up the very dwellings of
the state-less Palestinians. Why is it never asked why the Israelis do not
accept a Palestinian state?and continue constructing illegal settlements on
Palestinian land for fanatical settlers who hoard the available resources?
For those who are new to American reporting, the answer is clear: the
Palestinians just don?t count.

A similar note of silence is sounded for the absolutely miserable,
ghetto-like conditions Palestinian civilians suffer daily thanks to the
suffocation of blockades and checkpoints. A 50% poverty rate pervades the
Occupied Territories, meaning that, half of the people live on less than
just $2 a day. The 40%-70% unemployment rates in the region give us an even
greater picture of the suffering. A few months ago, Christian aid workers
found that 40% of Palestinian babies were born blind, deaf, or anemic in
the Territories. This is complemented by the 100% moral and professional
blindness and deafness of our media in its failure to examine or report any
of these disturbing statistics. Instead we learn only of Israel?s fears and
Israel?s anxiety.

Worst of all in the so-called reporting is the de-contextualized images of
Palestinian suicide bombers ?laying siege? to Israel. The gross disparities
of casualties in this conflict attest to its true nature: over 1,000
Palestinians have been killed and 17,600 have been injured in the last one
and a half years. In fact, since 1987, Palestinian civilian casualties have
exceeded Israel civilian casualties five-fold.  So what could possibly
explain the one-sided media coverage of violence that often points only to
Israel?s suicide-bombing victims, complete with photos of the Israeli
victims and moving accounts from relatives? What could explain the silence
over the slaughter of 28 Palestinians in December after Arafat declared a
cease-fire, which the media only reported as ?shattered? when Israelis died
weeks after? How has it come about that this one aspect of Palestinian
violence is ?the attack?, while Israel?s tanks, missiles, bombs, and
troops? daily presence and destruction is ?the reprisal?? Clearly, the m
edia is fit to pretend that some lives are simply worth more than others.

Last but not least, is the scorn heaped upon Arafat by op-ed writers
nationwide. Arafat is seemingly the source of all problems; not a shot will
be fired in the region without him being held responsible for it and all
its consequences. Arafat whispers strange things into the ears of IDF
gunmen, forcing them to mow down pregnant women and their husbands; he
appears falsely as Moses to the rabid settlers, with messianic messages to
beat Palestinian women and burn their crops; he guides Israeli tank turrets
towards targets like schools and homes; he levels Palestinian houses in
refugee camps by the dozens with Israeli bulldozers. Yes, apparently Arafat
can do all these things, and not only that but he can do them while Israel
blows up all his security and policing facilities. A remarkable man,

And thus is the Brown Man?s Burden in Palestine. The burden of a mother who
cannot bring her sick child to a hospital because of military checkpoints;
the burden of an injured man bleeding to death unable to receive medical
attention because of a roadblock; the burden of a father unable to work,
unable to provide, forced to shield his child from Israeli bullets with his
own body--to no avail. It is a burden made all the more dreadful by a media
spin machine whose gears turn in sync with the treads of an Israeli tank,
whose wheels churn in harmony with the screaming sound of IDF missiles, and
whose axles grind to the tune of Kipling?s call.

PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

More information about the Marxism mailing list