Scholars respond to witch-hunt website

Louis Proyect lnp3 at
Fri Sep 27 06:54:13 MDT 2002

NY Times, Sept. 27, 2002

Web Site Fuels Debate on Campus Anti-Semitism

A Web site started last week by a pro-Israel research and policy group, 
citing eight professors and 14 universities for their views on Palestinian 
rights or political Islam, has opened a new chapter in a growing debate 
over campus anti-Semitism.

In a show of solidarity with those named on the Web site, nearly 100 
outraged professors nationwide — Jews and non-Jews, English professors and 
Middle East specialists — have responded to the site by asking to be added 
to the list.

The Web site, Campus Watch (, with "dossiers" on 
individuals and institutions and requests for further submissions, is a 
project of the Philadelphia-based Middle East Forum, whose director, Daniel 
Pipes, has long argued that Americans have not paid sufficient attention to 
the dangers of political Islam.

The professors who were named include two from Columbia, Hamid Dabashi and 
Joseph Massad, and one each from Berkeley, Georgetown, Northeastern, the 
University of Michigan, the State University of New York at Binghamton and 
the University of Chicago. Those named have differing interests, and 
differing academic status: John Esposito of Georgetown, for example, is 
interested primarily in political Islam, and considered a leading scholar 
in the field, whereas some others are young professors known mostly for 
criticizing Israel.

The appearance of the Web site, just a day after Harvard's president, 
Lawrence H. Summers, made a widely publicized speech on campus 
anti-Semitism, is another indication of the tensions on campuses over the 
developments in the Middle East.

Some of those who asked to be added to the site said they were showing 
solidarity in opposing what they see as an assault on academic freedom. 
Others were more interested in showing that mainstream Middle Eastern 
scholars shared the views criticized on the Web site.

Mr. Pipes said the Web site was no threat to free speech. "We're engaged in 
a battle over ideas," he said. "To bring in this notion of academic freedom 
is nonsense. No one is interfering with their right to say anything they 

The response from Judith Butler, a comparative literature professor at 
Berkeley, circulated on the Internet, providing boilerplate for many other 
professors: "I have recently learned that your organization is compiling 
dossiers on professors at U.S. academic institutions who oppose the Israeli 
occupation and its brutality, actively support Palestinian rights of 
self-determination as well as a more informed and intelligent view of Islam 
than is currently represented in the U.S. media. I would be enormously 
honored to be counted among those who actively hold these positions and 
would like to be included in the list of those who are struggling for 

Those named on the site said they were heartened by the support.

"It's a new genre springing up, and I'm especially glad that it includes 
Jewish scholars," said Professor Dabashi, who heads Columbia's department 
of Middle Eastern and Asian language and cultures. "This is about 
McCarthyism, freedom of expression. It's very important that it not be made 
into a Jewish-Muslim kind of thing. I am most concerned for my Jewish 
students, that they might feel that they shouldn't take my class, that the 
atmosphere would be intimidating, or that they couldn't express their 

He and others named on the site have been deluged with negative e-mails.


Louis Proyect

PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.

More information about the Marxism mailing list