Ex Post Facto
walterlx at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 12 06:08:28 MDT 2003
If the law was on the books before she
went, then it's not a violation of the ex
post facto rule. That only happens if
you pass a rule and punish people for
actions taken before it was passed.
It's a bad rule, but this particular action
may not violate that particular provision.
----- Original Message -----
From: <bgramlich at runbox.com>
To: <marxism at lists.panix.com>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: Ex Post Facto
Isn't this a violation of the ex post facto clause
in the constitution? If it is, then isn't Bush breaking
the oath he swore to uphold and defend the Constitution?
More information about the Marxism