Fw: [ainriail] Direct action at Shannon shows the way
james.irldaly at ntlworld.com
Thu Feb 6 02:52:03 MST 2003
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew" <andy at dojo.tao.ca>
To: <ainriail at struggle.ws>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: [ainriail] Direct action at Shannon shows the way
> Direct Action at Shannon shows the way
> The coming war is a vast effort for the US and its lapdog Britain as
> hundreds of thousands of men and the tens of thousands of tons of
> they require are transported from bases in the US and Britain to the
> Modern war requires an enormous supply chain to keep all those fuel
> tanks and planes on the move. The modern way of killing using
> quantities of bullets, bombs and explosives.
> In 'Moving Mountains: Lessons in Leadership and Logistics from the
> General William G. Pagonis revealed that 7 million tons of supplies
had to be
> shipped to the battlefield then. Winston Churchill said of war:
> the beautiful, bright-coloured flower. Transport is the stem without
> never could have blossomed."
> There is often a feeling among anti-war activists that there is
little we can
> do to directly impact on war. The figures above suggest otherwise,
> supplies move through airports and ports near us, or down road and
> networks near the places we live. The quantities of supplies needed
> this war are enormous, in 1991 for instance the 1450th
> supplied 7.75 million gallons of fuel to the airforce and tanks
> Iraq[i]. We are not just talking tanks and infantry here, in WWII
the US army
> depended on over three times as many men to supply the information
> transport as were actually in combat[ii].
> One airport these supplies are flowing through is the commercial
> Shannon in the south west of Ireland. Every day and average of 5 or
> military planes land here to refuel as they transport soldiers and
> the Gulf. Some of these planes, like the Hercules C130 are
> military, and can even be used to drop bombs. Some others are of a
> type but are owned by the military and have a role in providing the
> support services that allow war to be waged. Most however are
> airlines charted by the military to transport troops.
> Over the last year Shannon airport has seen many protests by those
> the war. These protests have involved Direct Action, it the attempt
> directly effect the ability to wage war, on a number of occasions.
> numbers involved in these actions have not been huge, perhaps a
> hundred in all. But already they are having an impact on the war.
> On three occasions individuals or small groups of activists have
> reaching and damaging military planes. One result of this has been
> of the commercial airliners ferrying troops, World Airlines, have
> that they are going to stop using Shannon, and are diverting their
> troop transports to Frankfurt airport [iii]. The activists have
> succeeded in grounding a US Navy plane, after it was attacked
firstly with an
> axe and days later by five more activists from the 'Catholic Worker'
> organisation with hammers and axes.
> Of course if this sort of action only took place at Shannon then,
> has already caused headaches for those shipping supplies to the war,
> not present an insoluble problem. World Airlines have diverted to
> for the moment. But if these actions start to happen everywhere
there is an
> anti-war movement then the war machine is in trouble. And there is
> opposition to this war in every country in Europe and in the US
> Direct Actions are taking place in other countries already. Britain
> well over a dozen with a particular focus on the naval port of
> where Greenpeace is engaged in a sustained campaign to block the
> war supplies. But as in Ireland it is only a tiny minority of those
> in the anti-war movements who are involved in such actions.
> Shannon demonstrates that direct action gets the goods, that even a
> number of people tacking action can cause hiccups in the logistics
> What is now needed is that the anti-war movements start to take
> seriously. Up to now the political parties that are leading these
> have rubbished direct actions such as the ones at Shannon as
> 'individual action'. Now we have seen that these individual actions
> more of a direct impact on the war then six hundred times this
> passively marching though our towns.
> The slogan 'Stop the War' needs to be taken as more then a passive
plea to our
> rulers to stop supporting the war effort. It needs to be seen as a
> action - it is up to us to stop the war. If 300,000 can be
mobilised to march
> through London then surely 50,000 can be mobilised to shut down
> Military HQ also in the London area. Or 20,000 to march on the
> refuelling bases essential to the war that are scattered around
> Marches have and will continue to have an essential role in building
> opposition to the war and bringing new people into the movements.
But it is
> now clear that we can do more, that we can take action against this
> this war our rulers do not need us to fight as soldiers, they would
> do not require our support for the war. They do however need us to
> passive, for if we turn our disgust at this war into action against
> their war machine will grind to a halt.
> Joe Black
> More information on the protests at Shannon at
> http://struggle.ws/wsm/shannon.html and www.indymedia.ie
> More information on direct actions around the globe at
> i See http://www.millersgulfwar.org/utpage.html
> ii http://search.eb.com/normandy/articles/logistic_background.html
> iii http://www.indymedia.ie/cgi-bin/newswire.cgi?id=27145&start=20
> New global anarchist index
> 3000 + pages on anarchism, Ireland, Zapatistas
> revolutionary history and struggles around globalisation
> From the
> ainriail mailing list
> Join at
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
More information about the Marxism