cleon42 at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 5 14:29:51 MST 2003
I fully agree with Lou that the question of defeatism has to be posed
in the light of "what is best for the anti-war movement."
I also agree that calling for defeat of US imperialism is a correct
Assuming the US is going to war, the question is, what does making this
call accomplish? Will having some people with signs saying "Victory to
Iraq" actually *accomplish* this? No, it will further divide and
marginalize the movement.
Again, it's a two-question situation. On the one hand, you have the
question of "what position does a revolutionary socialist movement
take." On the other, you have the question of "what position does a
coalition of anti-war forces take." Forcing one upon the other--from
either direction--is an eternally *bad* idea.
Of course, a socialist organization takes the position of revolutionary
defeatism. But there's nothing saying that such an organization can't
work in a coalition with groups/individuals that *don't* hold such a
position, yet the ends are the same.
"Victory to Iraq," "US out of Iraq," and "No war in Iraq"--if any come
true--all have the same essential effect. That is, the US is no longer
butchering Iraqis. However, one will cause unnecessary schisms in the
anti-war movement, and the other two will not (necessarily).
Adam Levenstein cleon42 at yahoo.com
Microsoft will make something that doesn't suck when
they start manufacturing vacuum cleaners.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
More information about the Marxism