How The Bastards Operate Behind the Scenes

Jay Moore pieinsky at igc.org
Sat Mar 1 20:18:07 MST 2003


Hurray for Turkey's parliament for standing up and rejecting the U.S. bribe!
Here's another interesting piece of news tonight about how the U.S. operates
to win "consent" from its "allies".  You can read the memo by going to the
Observer's web site.

jay
www.neravt.com/left/

**********

Revealed: US dirty tricks to win vote on Iraq war
Secret document details American plan to bug phones and emails of key
Security Council members

Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy in New York and Peter Beaumont
Sunday March 2, 2003
The Observer
http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,905899,00.html

The United States is conducting a secret 'dirty tricks' campaign against UN
Security Council delegations in New York as part of its battle to win votes
in favour of war against Iraq.

Details of the aggressive surveillance operation, which involves
interception of the home and office telephones and the emails of UN
delegates in New York, are revealed in a document leaked to The Observer.

The disclosures were made in a memorandum written by a top official at the
National Security Agency - the US body which intercepts communications
around the world - and circulated to both senior agents in his organisation
and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency asking for its input.

The memo describes orders to staff at the agency, whose work is clouded in
secrecy, to step up its surveillance operations 'particularly directed at...
UN Security Council Members (minus US and GBR, of course)' to provide
up-to-the-minute intelligence for Bush officials on the voting intentions of
UN members regarding the issue of Iraq.

The leaked memorandum makes clear that the target of the heightened
surveillance efforts are the delegations from Angola, Cameroon, Chile,
Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan at the UN headquarters in New York - the
so-called 'Middle Six' delegations whose votes are being fought over by the
pro-war party, led by the US and Britain, and the party arguing for more
time for UN inspections, led by France, China and Russia.

The memo is directed at senior NSA officials and advises them that the
agency is 'mounting a surge' aimed at gleaning information not only on how
delegations on the Security Council will vote on any second resolution on
Iraq, but also 'policies', 'negotiating positions', 'alliances' and
'dependencies' - the 'whole gamut of information that could give US
policymakers an edge in obtaining results favourable to US goals or to head
off surprises'.

Dated 31 January 2003, the memo was circulated four days after the UN's
chief weapons inspector Hans Blix produced his interim report on Iraqi
compliance with UN resolution 1441.

It was sent by Frank Koza, chief of staff in the 'Regional Targets' section
of the NSA, which spies on countries that are viewed as strategically
important for United States interests.

Koza specifies that the information will be used for the US's 'QRC' - Quick
Response Capability - 'against' the key delegations.

Suggesting the levels of surveillance of both the office and home phones of
UN delegation members, Koza also asks regional managers to make sure that
their staff also 'pay attention to existing non-UN Security Council Member
UN-related and domestic comms [office and home telephones] for anything
useful related to Security Council deliberations'.

Koza also addresses himself to the foreign agency, saying: 'We'd appreciate
your support in getting the word to your analysts who might have similar
more indirect access to valuable information from accesses in your product
lines [ie, intelligence sources].' Koza makes clear it is an informal
request at this juncture, but adds: 'I suspect that you'll be hearing more
along these lines in formal channels.'

Disclosure of the US operation comes in the week that Blix will make what
many expect to be his final report to the Security Council.

It also comes amid increasingly threatening noises from the US towards
undecided countries on the Security Council who have been warned of the
unpleasant economic consequences of standing up to the US.

Sources in Washington familiar with the operation said last week that there
had been a division among Bush administration officials over whether to
pursue such a high-intensity surveillance campaign with some warning of the
serious consequences of discovery.

The existence of the surveillance operation, understood to have been
requested by President Bush's National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
is deeply embarrassing to the Americans in the middle of their efforts to
win over the undecided delegations.

The language and content of the memo were judged to be authentic by three
former intelligence operatives shown it by The Observer. We were also able
to establish that Frank Koza does work for the NSA and could confirm his
senior post in the Regional Targets section of the organisation.

The NSA main switchboard put The Observer through to extension 6727 at the
agency which was answered by an assistant, who confirmed it was Koza's
office. However, when The Observer asked to talk to Koza about the
surveillance of diplomatic missions at the United Nations, it was then told
'You have reached the wrong number'.

On protesting that the assistant had just said this was Koza's extension,
the assistant repeated that it was an erroneous extension, and hung up.

While many diplomats at the UN assume they are being bugged, the memo
reveals for the first time the scope and scale of US communications
intercepts targeted against the New York-based missions.

The disclosure comes at a time when diplomats from the countries have been
complaining about the outright 'hostility' of US tactics in recent days to
persuade then to fall in line, including threats to economic and aid
packages.

The operation appears to have been spotted by rival organisations in Europe.
'The Americans are being very purposeful about this,' said a source at a
European intelligence agency when asked about the US surveillance efforts.



~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.



More information about the Marxism mailing list