discussion/mode of production: socialism - reply to CB

Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Fri Nov 14 07:08:13 MST 2003



From: Waistline2 at aol.com

Reply
Wrong . .. wrong . . . wrong . . .
The workers are not refereed to as the grave digger of capital. Here you are

grievously mistaken and here is the crux of the problem. Here is what Marx 
states and it is something to thing about. 
"The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, 
replaces the isolation of the laborers, due to competition, by their
revolutionary 
combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, 
therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the
bourgeoisie 
produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore,
produces, 
above all, are its own gravediggers. Its fall and the victory of the
proletariat 
are equally inevitable."
The gravedigger is the advance of history and the agent is the proletariat. 

^^^^^^^^
CB: Can't buy that. "the advance of history" or "history" has to be people.
The actions of  the "agent" of history is history.  "Gravediggers" have to
be people. 



More later. 
Have a funeral or body viewing to do. An old friend Bonnie Brooks pasted and

the funeral tomorrow - the viewing of the body is now - Swansons Funeral
Home. 
Melvin P. 



~~~~~~~
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.



More information about the Marxism mailing list