Fwd: Chris Doss replies to Nestor on Russia
Lueko.Willms at t-online.de
Sat Sep 27 00:20:57 MDT 2003
[Sorry, my previous message left the reader in the dark what and whom
I was replying to]
in reply to:
# Subject: Re: Fwd: Chris Doss replies to Nestor on Russia
# From: "Nestor Gorojovsky" <nestorgoro at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
# Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:55:51 -0300
> There is a difference between a socialist (or pro-
> socialist, or pre-socialist, or para-socialist, or transitional,
> whatever) regime such as existed up to the late 80s (I am not against
> consideriing that it existed up to the botched perestroika --but
> could perestroika have not been botched, that is an open question),
> and the pro-capitalist or capitalist regime installed afterwards. And
> the difference shines as a bright summer Sun precisely on these
The same old pre-perestroyka regimes still are existent in most of
the central Asian republics, especially Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan,
and to some extent also Kazakhstan.
No break at all in the leading personel, hardly in the way of
ruling the society.
No need to grieve over the loss of the old die-hard stalinists.
They still rule in Tashkent and Ashkhabad. They are today the best
allies of US imperialism.
Is that what you are looking for?
/ Lueko.Willms at T-Online.de
PLEASE clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
More information about the Marxism