[Marxism] Is it really just a "liberal stampede"?Theyouthshiftfrom Bush 2000 to Kerry 2004

Mark Lause MLause at cinci.rr.com
Thu Aug 12 16:11:52 MDT 2004


Explain to me what YOU mean by the petty bourgeoisie.  I know what Marx
meant a century and a half ago--largely the self-employed small
businessmen, peasant freeholders, and professionals.  Subsequently, that
social layer became as extinct as the dodo--well, at least, Siberian

So what does this term mean today, in concrete terms?

I certainly don't see any great sociological difference between the
Nader campaign and those in which I was involved on behalf of "working
class" parties in the U.S. like the SWP.  Maybe the former tend to be a
bit older and more established in what they do, but I don't see any big
class difference in composition. And if we want to bring in historic
examples like the German Social Democrats or the British Labour Party or
the Italian Communists, I think the case is even more clear.

Or is your complaint about programmatic formulation?

I'm serious.  What is the basis for this "petty bourgeois" label?


More information about the Marxism mailing list