[Marxism] Ecological Economics vs The Misevaluation of Value by the Traditionalists
Brian_Shannon at verizon.net
Sun Aug 15 18:41:46 MDT 2004
"In essentiality, it merely states that if we can't quantify it in
dollars and cents, then we should just ignore any other concerns as
having no value!"
With some diffidence in jumping in on a question of political economy,
it seems to me to be to be a question of language. You want to
appropriate the word "value" for purposes entirely different from
understanding the laws of motion of capitalist economy. Thus your
interest in "other concerns." Of course, the long-range interests of
humanity means that we have interests other than the operation of
capitalist economics. But in Das Kapital, Marx was discussing something
Yet therein Marx also effectively described, to the extent that it was
evident in his day, the terrible human losses and ecological
destruction that went along with the rise of the domination of Capital.
There probably were even in his day, socialists who protested that he
was too narrow--another "dismal scientist."
Isn't this a modern restatement of the difference between Utopian
socialists and Marxists? Personally, I claim to be both.
from Brian Shannon
More information about the Marxism