[Marxism] Inuit environmentalism

Louis Proyect lnp3 at panix.com
Wed Dec 15 10:59:45 MST 2004

NY Times, December 15, 2004
Eskimos Seek to Recast Global Warming as a Rights Issue

The Eskimos, or Inuit, about 155,000 seal-hunting peoples scattered around 
the Arctic, plan to seek a ruling from the Inter-American Commission on 
Human Rights that the United States, by contributing substantially to 
global warming, is threatening their existence.

The Inuit plan is part of a broader shift in the debate over human-caused 
climate change evident among participants in the 10th round of 
international talks taking place in Buenos Aires aimed at averting 
dangerous human interference with the climate system.

Inuit leaders said they planned to announce the effort at the climate 
meeting today.

Representatives of poor countries and communities - from the Arctic fringes 
to the atolls of the tropics to the flanks of the Himalayas - say they are 
imperiled by rising temperatures and seas through no fault of their own. 
They are casting the issue as no longer simply an environmental problem but 
as an assault on their basic human rights.

The commission, an investigative arm of the Organization of American 
States, has no enforcement powers. But a declaration that the United States 
has violated the Inuit's rights could create the foundation for an eventual 
lawsuit, either against the United States in an international court or 
against American companies in federal court, said a number of legal 
experts, including some aligned with industry.

Such a petition could have decent prospects now that industrial countries, 
including the United States, have concluded in recent reports and studies 
that warming linked to heat-trapping smokestack and tailpipe emissions is 
contributing to big environmental changes in the Arctic, a number of 
experts said.

Last month, an assessment of Arctic climate change by 300 scientists for 
the eight countries with Arctic territory, including the United States, 
concluded that "human influences" are now the dominant factor.

Inuit representatives attending the conference said in telephone interviews 
that after studying the matter for several years with the help of 
environmental lawyers they would this spring begin the lengthy process of 
filing a petition by collecting videotaped statements from elders and 
hunters about the effects they were experiencing from the shrinking 
northern icescape.

The lawyers, at EarthJustice, a nonprofit San Francisco law firm, and the 
Center for International Environmental Law, in Washington, said the 
Inter-American Commission, which has a record of treating environmental 
degradation as a human rights matter, provides the best chance of success. 
The Inuit have standing in the Organization of American States through Canada.

Sheila Watt-Cloutier, the elected chairwoman of the Inuit Circumpolar 
Conference, the quasi-governmental group recognized by the United Nations 
as representing the Inuit, said the biggest fear was not that warming would 
kill individuals but that it would be the final blow to a sturdy but 
suffering culture.

"We've had to struggle as a people to keep afloat, to keep our indigenous 
wisdom and traditions," she said. "We're an adaptable people, but 
adaptability has its limits.

"Something is bound to give, and it's starting to give in the Arctic, and 
we're giving that early warning signal to the rest of the world."

If the Inuit effort succeeds, it could lead to an eventual stream of 
litigation, somewhat akin to lawsuits against tobacco companies, legal 
experts said.

The two-week convention, which ends Friday, is the latest session on two 
climate treaties: the 1992 framework convention on climate change and the 
Kyoto Protocol, an addendum that takes effect in February and for the first 
time requires most industrialized countries to curb such emissions.

The United States has signed both pacts and is bound by the 1992 treaty, 
which requires no emissions cuts. But the Bush administration opposes the 
mandatory Kyoto treaty, saying it could harm the economy and unfairly 
excuses big developing countries from obligations.

That situation makes the United States particularly vulnerable to such 
suits, environmental lawyers said.

By embracing the first treaty and signing the second, it has acknowledged 
that climate change is a problem to be avoided; but by subsequently 
rejecting the Kyoto pact, the lawyers said, it has not shown a commitment 
to stemming its emissions, which constitute a fourth of the global total.

The American delegation at the Buenos Aires conference declined to comment 
on Tuesday on the petition or the arguments behind it. "Until the Inuit 
have presented a complaint, we are not responding to that issue," a State 
Department official said. "When they do, we will look at what they have to 
say, consider it and then respond."

Christopher C. Horner, a lawyer for the Cooler Heads Coalition, an 
industry-financed group opposed to cutting the emissions, said the chances 
of success of such lawsuits had risen lately.

 From his standpoint, he said, "The planets are aligned very poorly."

Delegates who flew to the conference from the Arctic's far-flung 
communities, where retreating sea ice imperils traditional seal hunts, said 
they planned to meet in Buenos Aires with representatives from small-island 
nations that could eventually be swamped by rising seas, swelled by 
meltwater from shrinking glaciers and Arctic ice sheets.

Enele S. Sopoaga, the ambassador to the United Nations from Tuvalu, a 
15-foot-high nation of wave-pounded atolls halfway between Australia and 
Hawaii, said he still saw legal efforts as a last resort.

Tuvalu had threatened to sue the United States two years ago in the 
International Court of Justice, but held off for a variety of reasons.



More information about the Marxism mailing list