[Marxism] how many deaths could have been prevented?

acpollack2 at juno.com acpollack2 at juno.com
Sun Dec 26 18:22:55 MST 2004

on limited scope of warning system, see:
and re your question re GPS:
"USGS working on a GPS based early earthquake warning system"
plus if you google USGS, GPS, early warning system etc. you'll find tons

-- Reihana Mohideen <reihana_m at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
How true. The deaths in the recent floods in the Philippines was primarily due to deforestation and because people in the rural areas mainly live in wooden shacks. Apparently these Tsunami earthquake warning systems are very expensive to install, but this points to government priorities. What I would also like to know is why the sophisticated satelite technology today can't pick these earthquake movements up.

"acpollack2 at juno.com" <acpollack2 at juno.com> wrote:

In the Reuters story on the "natural" earthquake/tsunami disaster (http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=SXONUMF4CYS2GCRBAELCFFA?type=topNews&storyID=7179996) is this quote:
"'A warning center such as those used along the Pacific Rim could have saved most of the thousands of people who died, A United States Geological Survey official said. 'And I think this will be a lesson to them,' he said, referring to the devastated countries."
Leaving aside his cynical tone, two questions:
1) Why wasn't it in place?
2) How many deaths were also due to the shoddy construction usually responsible for most of the deaths in such "natural" disasters? I suspect this time many if not most were due to lack of warning; still, either way, they were preventable, if only society planned its resource use for such purposes.

Marxism mailing list
Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
Marxism mailing list
Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu

More information about the Marxism mailing list