[Marxism] A Henwood-Featherstone-Parenti article
lnp3 at panix.com
Tue Feb 10 10:16:29 MST 2004
Johannes Schneider wrote:
> But this was back in the good old sixties, when there was still
> something called the Soviet Bloc. But the times have changed. Today the
> FMLN in El Salvador his heading for election victory and no one cares.
I have no idea why you would say this. When Daniel Ortega was poised to
win the last election in Nicaragua, the USA branded him as a terrorist.
You might think that a reformist FMLN government would be of no interest
to the USA. My reading of Latin American history tells me otherwise.
> Your initial assertion was that unspecified 'left' Latin American
> governments substantially challenged 'neoliberalism'. OK, you did not
> mean Brazil, so who remains?
Kirchner and Chavez. Plus looming populist victories in Ecuador and
Bolivia. This is not acceptable to the USA. The red-baiting campaign
against Kirchner, who refused to disavow the Cuban revolution, should be
noted as well.
> Almost no one backed the Iraq war. Led by Schroeder, Chirac and Putin
> most governments in the world opposed it (even if Fox News makes you
> Americans believe something else). This is hardly a sign of opposing
I was alluding to Cuba, which has been named as part of the axis of
evil. I apologize if I didn't make that clear enough.
> Actually I doubt this goes much beyond slogans. Here is what economist
> Claudio Katz writes about the Mercosur as an counter-weight against
> US-sponsored FTAA:
Can't say that this comes as a big surprise. Katz is a leader of the
Autonomy and Freedom (Autonomia y Libertad) movement in Argentina, which
was founded by Luis Zamora, an ex-Morenoite who became converted to
autonomist-Zapatismo. They've never run into a state anywhere that can
live up to their satisfaction. Some New Yorkers have the same problem
when it comes to establishing relationships with the opposite or same sex.
The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
More information about the Marxism