[Marxism] Why didn't Lenin go capitalist-Marx political economy/bureaucracy

Waistline2 at aol.com Waistline2 at aol.com
Sat Jun 5 13:14:17 MDT 2004

could you elaborate or clarify on this "barrier" further?  are you saying 
that the new technological regime which is emerging today had the potential 
to develop in the fSU, a full generation ahead of the imperial centers, 
only to be blocked by the "barrier" of the entrenchment of the industrial 
bureaucracy?  or is the "barrier" the fact that the injection of 
computerization/advanced robotics itself wasn't ready to happen?



Sorry . . . after reading my imput for the day I did not answer your 
question. Part of the real problem in answering a very valid question is the form of 
exposition that poses the question in a manner that allows it to answer itself. 
How I arrived at my conclusions has been an extremely lengthy process 
spanning no less than twenty years. The economic and political basis of the 
presentation of the question of the bureaucracy and Soviet industrial development is 
rooted in an old pamphlet written by Soviet Communists during the period when 
that puny buffoon Khrushchev came to power. 

The name of the pamphlet is "Program and Principles of the Revolutionary 
Soviet Communists (Bolsheviks)" and was reprinted in 1979 by Workers Press with an 
Introduction by Nelson Peery. 

The first line of the Introduction by Peery states: 

"Some twenty years have passed since the "Program and Principles of the 
Revolutionary Soviet Communists (Bolsheviks)" was published." 

This statement locates the document between the years 1959 (it was published 
in 1979) and roughly 1955. This document has the impact of the Communist 
Manifesto. The grouping that produced this document was tightly linked with loyal 
Molotov - the greatest statesman of the world proletariat brigade. 

I will make a copy of this document and send it to you if you write me off 
list. Section 3 is called "The Domination of the Bureaucracy" and describes the 
politics of the struggle within the Soviet Union and the CPSU from the vantage 
point within the Soviet Power. One must remember that the Sino-Soviet split 
had just taken place. 

The distinction between the organs of the state and the bureaucracy is 
profound. They write things like the following:

"To entrench themselves within the organs of the state power, the bureaucracy 
had to claim that it was following the correct path, in other words, not only 
that it was true to revolutionary ideas, but that it was even more devoted to 
Soviet power than Stalin himself." 

Three interactive categories immediately jump out from the above sentence 
written almost 50 years ago. 1. The organs of the state power. 2. The bureaucracy 
and lastly the Soviet Power. 

I did not write this document and was born in 1952. 

This document was written before the industrial system hit the barrier to its 
quantitative expansion as a specific combination of human labor and 
electromechanical process. This barrier was not hit until the 1970s and early 1980s.

Enough for today. 


More information about the Marxism mailing list